IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0223849.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Co-prescription network reveals social dynamics of opioid doctor shopping

Author

Listed:
  • Brea L Perry
  • Kai Cheng Yang
  • Patrick Kaminski
  • Meltem Odabas
  • Jaehyuk Park
  • Michelle Martel
  • Carrie B Oser
  • Patricia R Freeman
  • Yong-Yeol Ahn
  • Jeffery Talbert

Abstract

This paper examines network prominence in a co-prescription network as an indicator of opioid doctor shopping (i.e., fraudulent solicitation of opioids from multiple prescribers). Using longitudinal data from a large commercially insured population, we construct a network where a tie between patients is weighted by the number of shared opioid prescribers. Given prior research suggesting that doctor shopping may be a social process, we hypothesize that active doctor shoppers will occupy central structural positions in this network. We show that network prominence, operationalized using PageRank, is associated with more opioid prescriptions, higher predicted risk for dangerous morphine dosage, opioid overdose, and opioid use disorder, controlling for number of prescribers and other variables. Moreover, as a patient’s prominence increases over time, so does their risk for these outcomes, compared to their own average level of risk. Results highlight the importance of co-prescription networks in characterizing high-risk social dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Brea L Perry & Kai Cheng Yang & Patrick Kaminski & Meltem Odabas & Jaehyuk Park & Michelle Martel & Carrie B Oser & Patricia R Freeman & Yong-Yeol Ahn & Jeffery Talbert, 2019. "Co-prescription network reveals social dynamics of opioid doctor shopping," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0223849
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223849
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0223849
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0223849&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0223849?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0223849. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.