IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0223571.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A survey of public attitudes toward uterus transplantation, surrogacy, and adoption in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Akari Nakazawa
  • Tetsuya Hirata
  • Tomoko Arakawa
  • Natsuki Nagashima
  • Shinya Fukuda
  • Kazuaki Neriishi
  • Miyuki Harada
  • Yasushi Hirota
  • Kaori Koga
  • Osamu Wada-Hiraike
  • Yoshio Koizumi
  • Tomoyuki Fujii
  • Minoru Irahara
  • Yutaka Osuga

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the attitudes of male and female members of the public toward uterus transplantation (UTx), surrogacy, and adoption in Japan via a web-based survey. One thousand six hundred participants were recruited with equal segregation of age (20s, 30s, 40s, and 50s) and gender. We assessed the association between ethical view and gender, age, infertility, and the knowledge level of UTx, using a questionnaire. The findings were as follows. First, 36.5% and 31.0% of respondents agreed that UTx and gestational surrogacy should be approved, respectively. Second, the respondents would potentially choose to receive UTx (34.4%), gestational surrogacy (31.9%), and adoption (40.3%), if they or their partners experienced absolute uterine factor infertility. Third, 10.1%, 5.8%, and 14.3% of the respondents chose UTx, gestational surrogacy, and adoption as the most favorable option, respectively. Fourth, if their daughters suffered from absolute uterine factor infertility, 32.3% of female respondents might want to be donors, and 36.7% of male respondents might ask their wives to be donors. These data were affected by age, gender, infertility, or the knowledge level of UTx. UTx was a more acceptable option than gestational surrogacy and adoption. The effects of gender, age, infertility, and the level of knowledge of UTx are important in understanding the attitude toward UTx. On the other hand, there were concerns about the safety of UTx for recipients, donors, and babies. It is important to continue to understand public attitudes to inform the development and safety of UTx, which will enhance the discussion on the ethical consensus on UTx.

Suggested Citation

  • Akari Nakazawa & Tetsuya Hirata & Tomoko Arakawa & Natsuki Nagashima & Shinya Fukuda & Kazuaki Neriishi & Miyuki Harada & Yasushi Hirota & Kaori Koga & Osamu Wada-Hiraike & Yoshio Koizumi & Tomoyuki F, 2019. "A survey of public attitudes toward uterus transplantation, surrogacy, and adoption in Japan," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0223571
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223571
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0223571
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0223571&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0223571?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0223571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.