IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0223567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mindfulness meditation, time judgment and time experience: Importance of the time scale considered (seconds or minutes)

Author

Listed:
  • Sylvie Droit-Volet
  • Magali Chaulet
  • Frederic Dutheil
  • Michaël Dambrun

Abstract

This manuscript presents two studies on the effect of mindfulness meditation on duration judgment and its relationship to the subjective experience of time when the interval durations are on the second or the minute time scale. After the first 15 minutes of a 30-min meditation or control exercise, meditation-trained participants judged interval durations of 15 to 50 s or 2 to 6 min, during which they performed either a mindfulness meditation exercise or a control exercise. The participants’ scores on the self-reported scales indicated the effectiveness of the meditation exercise, as it increased the level of present-moment awareness and happiness and decreased that of anxiety. The results showed an underestimation of time for the short interval durations and an overestimation of time for the long intervals, although the participants always reported that time passed faster with meditation than with the control exercise. Further statistical analyses revealed that the focus on the present-moment significantly mediated the exercise effect on the time estimates for long durations. The inversion in time estimates between the two time scales is explained in terms of the different mechanisms underlying the judgment of short and long durations, i.e., the cognitive mechanisms of attention and memory, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Sylvie Droit-Volet & Magali Chaulet & Frederic Dutheil & Michaël Dambrun, 2019. "Mindfulness meditation, time judgment and time experience: Importance of the time scale considered (seconds or minutes)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-22, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0223567
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0223567
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0223567&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0223567?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sylvie Droit-Volet & Sophie Monceau & Mickaël Berthon & Panos Trahanias & Michail Maniadakis, 2018. "The explicit judgment of long durations of several minutes in everyday life: Conscious retrospective memory judgment and the role of affects?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sylvie Droit-Volet & Sandrine Gil & Natalia Martinelli & Nicolas Andant & Maélys Clinchamps & Lénise Parreira & Karine Rouffiac & Michael Dambrun & Pascal Huguet & Benoît Dubuis & Bruno Pereira & COVI, 2020. "Time and Covid-19 stress in the lockdown situation: Time free, «Dying» of boredom and sadness," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruth S Ogden, 2020. "The passage of time during the UK Covid-19 lockdown," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0223567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.