IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0222927.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Common variants in glyoxalase I do not increase chronic pancreatitis risk

Author

Listed:
  • Tom Kaune
  • Marcus Hollenbach
  • Bettina Keil
  • Jian-Min Chen
  • Emmanuelle Masson
  • Carla Becker
  • Marko Damm
  • Claudia Ruffert
  • Robert Grützmann
  • Albrecht Hoffmeister
  • Rene H M te Morsche
  • Giulia Martina Cavestro
  • Raffaella Alessia Zuppardo
  • Adrian Saftoiu
  • Ewa Malecka-Panas
  • Stanislaw Głuszek
  • Peter Bugert
  • Markus M Lerch
  • Frank Ulrich Weiss
  • Wen-Bin Zou
  • Zhuan Liao
  • Peter Hegyi
  • Joost PH Drenth
  • Jan Riedel
  • Claude Férec
  • Markus Scholz
  • Holger Kirsten
  • Andrea Tóth
  • Maren Ewers
  • Heiko Witt
  • Heidi Griesmann
  • Patrick Michl
  • Jonas Rosendahl

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic pancreatitis (CP) may be caused by oxidative stress. An important source of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is the methylglyoxal-derived formation of advanced glycation endproducts (AGE). Methylglyoxal is detoxified by Glyoxalase I (GLO1). A reduction in GLO1 activity results in increased ROS. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of GLO1 have been linked to various inflammatory diseases. Here, we analyzed whether common GLO1 variants are associated with alcoholic (ACP) and non-alcoholic CP (NACP). Methods: Using melting curve analysis, we genotyped a screening cohort of 223 ACP, 218 NACP patients, and 328 controls for 11 tagging SNPs defined by the SNPinfo LD TAG SNP Selection tool and the functionally relevant variant rs4746. For selected variants the cohorts were extended to up to 1,441 patient samples. Results: In the ACP cohort, comparison of genotypes for rs1937780 between patients and controls displayed an ambiguous result in the screening cohort (p = 0.08). However, in the extended cohort of 1,441 patients no statistically significant association was found for the comparison of genotypes (p = 0.11), nor in logistic regression analysis (p = 0.214, OR 1.072, 95% CI 0.961–1.196). In the NACP screening cohort SNPs rs937662, rs1699012, and rs4746 displayed an ambiguous result when patients were compared to controls in the recessive or dominant model (p = 0.08, 0.08, and 0.07, respectively). Again, these associations were not confirmed in the extended cohorts (rs937662, dominant model: p = 0.07, logistic regression: p = 0.07, OR 1.207, 95% CI 0.985–1.480) or in the replication cohorts for rs4746 (Germany, p = 0.42, OR 1.080, 95% CI 0.673–1.124; France, p = 0.19, OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.76–1.06; China, p = 0.24, OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.90–1.54) and rs1699012 (Germany, Munich; p = 0.279, OR 0.903, 95% CI 0.750–1.087). Conclusions: Common GLO1 variants do not increase chronic pancreatitis risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Tom Kaune & Marcus Hollenbach & Bettina Keil & Jian-Min Chen & Emmanuelle Masson & Carla Becker & Marko Damm & Claudia Ruffert & Robert Grützmann & Albrecht Hoffmeister & Rene H M te Morsche & Giulia , 2019. "Common variants in glyoxalase I do not increase chronic pancreatitis risk," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0222927
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0222927
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0222927&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0222927?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0222927. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.