IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0220411.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A qualitative examination of barriers and solutions to renal transplantation in Malaysia: Key-informants’ perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Gan Kim Soon
  • Soo Kun Lim
  • Sanjay Rampal
  • Tin Tin Su

Abstract

Introduction: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is increasing globally, and renal transplantation (RT) is the preferred renal replacement therapy to treat ESRD. Internationally, there are only a few countries with RT rates above 50 per million population (pmp), while most of the countries have RT rates between 30–40 pmp. The low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) makes up the majority for the RT rates below 20 pmp in which Malaysia belongs to despite its increasing ESRD rates. There is a need to explore the barriers to access RT with targeted solutions to improve the RT rates and service in LMIC. Thus, a qualitative study was undertaken in Malaysia to address this issue. Method: A qualitative methodological approach was performed between March-May 2018. Semi-structured interviews were used to explore current RT policy and service availability. Key-informants were identified from a detailed stakeholder analysis of RT system in Malaysia. Interviews were digitally audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, coded with ATLAS.ti software and underwent thematic analysis thoroughly. Results: Eight key-informants participated in the study. Barriers and related solutions were classified using the socio-ecological model (SEM). As reported, the barriers and solutions of RT in Malaysia are the results of a complex interplay of personal, cultural, and environmental factors. Key barriers are linked to public’s attitude and perception towards RT and the unaccommodating practices in the healthcare fraternity for RT. Key-informants provided a systematic solution that shed light on how RT could be improved at each SEM level via effective communication, education and inter-agency collaboration. Conclusion: The SEM provided a framework to foster a better understanding of current practice, barriers, and solutions to RT in Malaysia. This study is the first to explore the barriers and related solutions to RT comprehensively as a whole. Implications of these findings could prompt a policy change for a better RT service delivery model not just for Malaysia but also for other LMIC. Further stakeholder engagement and evaluation of the systems are required to provide insight into best practices that will help to improve the RT rates and service in Malaysia.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Gan Kim Soon & Soo Kun Lim & Sanjay Rampal & Tin Tin Su, 2019. "A qualitative examination of barriers and solutions to renal transplantation in Malaysia: Key-informants’ perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0220411
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0220411
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0220411&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0220411?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tony Scully, 2012. "Diabetes in numbers," Nature, Nature, vol. 485(7398), pages 2-3, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nasir, Hanis, 2022. "On the dynamics of a diabetic population model with two delays and a general recovery rate of complications," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 571-602.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eric N. Liberda & Aleksandra M. Zuk & Ian D. Martin & Leonard J. S. Tsuji, 2020. "Fisher’s Linear Discriminant Function Analysis and its Potential Utility as a Tool for the Assessment of Health-and-Wellness Programs in Indigenous Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Zhenzhu Tang & Zhifeng Fang & Wei Huang & Zhanhua Liu & Yuzhu Chen & Zhongyou Li & Ting Zhu & Qichun Wang & Steve Simpson & Bruce V. Taylor & Rui Lin, 2016. "Non-Obese Diabetes and Its Associated Factors in an Underdeveloped Area of South China, Guangxi," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-12, September.
    3. Karen Schellong & Sandra Schulz & Thomas Harder & Andreas Plagemann, 2012. "Birth Weight and Long-Term Overweight Risk: Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis Including 643,902 Persons from 66 Studies and 26 Countries Globally," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-1, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0220411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.