IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0219511.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The perfusion index measured by the pulse oximeter affects the agreement between ClearSight and the arterial catheter-based blood pressures: A prospective observational study

Author

Listed:
  • Masashi Yokose
  • Takahiro Mihara
  • Masahiro Takaya
  • Takumi Yamamoto
  • Yusuke Saigusa
  • Shunsuke Takaki
  • Takahisa Goto

Abstract

Background: ClearSight is a noninvasive arterial blood pressure monitor, but it remains unknown whether it is affected by the state of perfusion to the fingers. We investigated whether the lower perfusion index (PI) measured with a pulse oximeter, which reflects finger perfusion, would affect the agreement between arterial pressures measured with ClearSight versus those obtained with an arterial catheter. Methods: Paired arterial pressure data (ClearSight and arterial catheter-based pressures) and PI values were prospectively obtained from 30 patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. The primary outcome was standard deviation (SD) of the bias (precision) of blood pressure between ClearSight and arterial catheter. The ratio of the adjusted SD of the bias between PI≤1 and PI>1 was calculated using the linear mixed-effects model. The secondary outcomes were the bias and the limits of agreement (LOA) between the two devices (repeated measures Bland-Altman analysis). Results: We analyzed 6312 paired data points. The adjusted SD of bias in PI ≤1 compared with those in PI >1 was 1.4-fold (95% confidence interval: 1.3- to 1.4-fold) for systolic arterial pressure, 1.5-fold (95% confidence interval: 1.3- to 1.6-fold) for diastolic arterial pressure, and 1.3-fold (95% confidence interval: 1.2- to 1.5-fold) for mean arterial pressure. The bias (LOA) were as follows: systolic arterial pressure in the PI ≤1 and PI >1 groups, -3.5 (-35.4 to 28.4) mmHg and 2.2 (-19.9 to 24.3) mmHg, respectively; diastolic arterial pressure in the PI ≤1 and PI >1 groups, 13.1 (-5.1 to 31.3) mmHg and 9.0, (-2.6 to 20.6) mmHg, respectively; and mean arterial pressure in the PI ≤1 and PI >1 groups, 8.7 (-11.3 to 28.7) mmHg and 7.6 (-6.2 to 21.3) mmHg, respectively. Conclusions: PI ≤1 was associated with a large SD of the bias between the devices. The PI value could be a real-time indicator of ClearSight precision.

Suggested Citation

  • Masashi Yokose & Takahiro Mihara & Masahiro Takaya & Takumi Yamamoto & Yusuke Saigusa & Shunsuke Takaki & Takahisa Goto, 2019. "The perfusion index measured by the pulse oximeter affects the agreement between ClearSight and the arterial catheter-based blood pressures: A prospective observational study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-11, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0219511
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0219511
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0219511&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0219511?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0219511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.