IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0218642.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A machine learning algorithm predicts molecular subtypes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with differential response to gemcitabine-based versus FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy

Author

Listed:
  • Georgios Kaissis
  • Sebastian Ziegelmayer
  • Fabian Lohöfer
  • Katja Steiger
  • Hana Algül
  • Alexander Muckenhuber
  • Hsi-Yu Yen
  • Ernst Rummeny
  • Helmut Friess
  • Roland Schmid
  • Wilko Weichert
  • Jens T Siveke
  • Rickmer Braren

Abstract

Purpose: Development of a supervised machine-learning model capable of predicting clinically relevant molecular subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) from diffusion-weighted-imaging-derived radiomic features. Methods: The retrospective observational study assessed 55 surgical PDAC patients. Molecular subtypes were defined by immunohistochemical staining of KRT81. Tumors were manually segmented and 1606 radiomic features were extracted with PyRadiomics. A gradient-boosted-tree algorithm was trained on 70% of the patients (N = 28) and tested on 30% (N = 17) to predict KRT81+ vs. KRT81- tumor subtypes. A gradient-boosted survival regression model was fit to the disease-free and overall survival data. Chemotherapy response and survival were assessed stratified by subtype and radiomic signature. Radiomic feature importance was ranked. Results: The mean±STDEV sensitivity, specificity and ROC-AUC were 0.90±0.07, 0.92±0.11, and 0.93±0.07, respectively. The mean±STDEV concordance indices between the disease-free and overall survival predicted by the model based on the radiomic parameters and actual patient survival were 0.76±0.05 and 0.71±0.06, respectively. Patients with a KRT81+ subtype experienced significantly diminished median overall survival compared to KRT81- patients (7.0 vs. 22.6 months, HR 4.03, log-rank-test P =

Suggested Citation

  • Georgios Kaissis & Sebastian Ziegelmayer & Fabian Lohöfer & Katja Steiger & Hana Algül & Alexander Muckenhuber & Hsi-Yu Yen & Ernst Rummeny & Helmut Friess & Roland Schmid & Wilko Weichert & Jens T Si, 2019. "A machine learning algorithm predicts molecular subtypes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with differential response to gemcitabine-based versus FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0218642
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218642
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0218642
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0218642&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0218642?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Charlie Saillard & Flore Delecourt & Benoit Schmauch & Olivier Moindrot & Magali Svrcek & Armelle Bardier-Dupas & Jean Francois Emile & Mira Ayadi & Vinciane Rebours & Louis de Mestier & Pascal Hammel, 2023. "Pacpaint: a histology-based deep learning model uncovers the extensive intratumor molecular heterogeneity of pancreatic adenocarcinoma," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0218642. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.