IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0218201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cognitive profiles and associated structural brain networks in a multimorbid sample of marginalized adults

Author

Listed:
  • Kristina M Gicas
  • Andrea A Jones
  • William J Panenka
  • Chantelle Giesbrecht
  • Donna J Lang
  • Fidel Vila-Rodriguez
  • Olga Leonova
  • Alasdair M Barr
  • Ric M Procyshyn
  • Wayne Su
  • Alexander Rauscher
  • A Talia Vertinsky
  • Tari Buchanan
  • G William MacEwan
  • Allen E Thornton
  • William G Honer

Abstract

Introduction: Cognition is impaired in homeless and vulnerably housed persons. Within this heterogeneous and multimorbid group, distinct profiles of cognitive dysfunction are evident. However, little is known about the underlying neurobiological substrates. Imaging structural covariance networks provides a novel investigative strategy to characterizing relationships between brain structure and function within these different cognitive subgroups. Method: Participants were 208 homeless and vulnerably housed persons. Cluster analysis was used to group individuals on the basis of similarities in cognitive functioning in the areas of attention, memory, and executive functioning. The principles of graph theory were applied to construct two brain networks for each cognitive group, using measures of cortical thickness and gyrification. Global and regional network properties were compared across networks for each of the three cognitive clusters. Results: Three cognitive groups were defined by: higher cognitive functioning across domains (Cluster 1); lower cognitive functioning with a decision-making strength (Cluster 3); and an intermediate group with a relative executive functioning weakness (Cluster 2). Between-group differences were observed for cortical thickness, but not gyrification networks. The lower functioning cognitive group exhibited higher segregation and reduced integration, higher centrality in select nodes, and less spatially compact modules compared with the two other groups. Conclusions: The cortical thickness network differences of Cluster 3 suggest that major disruptions in structural connectivity underlie cognitive dysfunction in a subgroup of people who have a high multimorbid illness burden and who are vulnerably housed or homeless. The origins, and possible plasticity of these structure-function relationships identified with network analysis warrant further study.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristina M Gicas & Andrea A Jones & William J Panenka & Chantelle Giesbrecht & Donna J Lang & Fidel Vila-Rodriguez & Olga Leonova & Alasdair M Barr & Ric M Procyshyn & Wayne Su & Alexander Rauscher & , 2019. "Cognitive profiles and associated structural brain networks in a multimorbid sample of marginalized adults," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0218201
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0218201
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0218201&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0218201?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0218201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.