IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0215732.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Achieving optimal best practice: An inquiry into its nature and characteristics

Author

Listed:
  • Huy P Phan
  • Bing H Ngu
  • Hui-Wen Wang
  • Jen-Hwa Shih
  • Sheng-Ying Shi
  • Ruey-Yih Lin

Abstract

The study of optimal best practice within the context of academia has produced both empirical and theoretical contributions. Optimal best practice, also coined as optimal functioning, is concerned with a person’s personal best–that is, “what is the best that I can do for this academic subject?” Research in the social sciences has, to date, explored different types of optimal best–physical, cognitive, emotional, and social. What is of considerable interest, as a related matter, is a question of how a person reaches and experiences a level of optimal best practice. Recent research development, for example, has explored various conceptualizations of optimal best practice–for example, one distinctive theoretical model, the Framework of Achievement Bests [1, 2], makes a concerted effort to explore the underlying process of optimization–that is, in this case, how an optimal level of best practice is achieved.The present study, as detailed below, investigates via means of non-experimental data a theoretical model pertaining to the achievement of optimal best practice. This examination, we postulate, would enable us to add clarity and provide additional theoretical insights the operational nature of the process of optimization. The operational nature of optimization, as described in our recent research [1, 3], emphasizes three major tenets: (i) the main sources of a person’s optimal best practice, (ii) the potential ‘optimizing’ influences of three comparable agencies on the achievement of optimal best practice (i.e., personal resolve, social relationship, and personal self-efficacy), and (iii) the impact of optimal best practice on future adaptive outcomes (i.e., academic striving and personal well-being). We explored this topic via means of the use of a non-experimental, correlational design with participants drawn from Taiwanese university students (N = 1010). Structural equation modelling (SEM) produced evidence, which empirically supported existing research [1, 3] and substantiated our knowledge of the concept of optimal best practice.Evidence established from the present study has also assisted us to identify one pervasive issue, which we call for further research development–namely, to consider, design, and develop an appropriate methodological approach that would enable researchers to accurately measure and assess the process of optimization. Finally, in terms of teaching and learning, we acknowledge that our research investigation has provided some insights into potential educational practices for implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Huy P Phan & Bing H Ngu & Hui-Wen Wang & Jen-Hwa Shih & Sheng-Ying Shi & Ruey-Yih Lin, 2019. "Achieving optimal best practice: An inquiry into its nature and characteristics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-31, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0215732
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215732
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0215732
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0215732&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0215732?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0215732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.