Using proteomics to advance the search for potential biomarkers for preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Preeclampsia (PE) is a leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although predictive multiparametric screening is being developed, it is not applicable to nulliparous women, and is not applied to low-risk women. As PE is considered a heterogenous disorder, it is unlikely that any single multiparametric screening protocol containing a small group of biomarkers could have the required accuracy to predict all PE subgroups. Given the etiology of PE is complex and not fully understood, it begs the question, whether the search for biomarkers based on the predominant view of impaired placentation involving factors predominately implicated in angiogenesis and inflammation, has been too limiting. Here we highlight the enormous potential of state-of-the-art, high-throughput proteomics, to provide a comprehensive and unbiased approach to biomarker identification. Methods and findings: Our literature search identified 1336 articles; after review, 45 studies with proteomic data from PE women that were eligible for inclusion. From 710 proteins with altered abundance, we identified 13 common circulating proteins, some of which had not been previously considered as prospective biomarkers of PE. An additional search of the literature for original publications testing any of the 13 common proteins using non-proteomic techniques was also undertaken. Strikingly, 9 of these common proteins had been independently evaluated in PE studies as potential biomarkers. Conclusion: This study highlights the potential of using high-throughput data sets, which are comprehensive and without bias, to identify a profile of proteins that may improve predictions of PE and understanding of its etiology. We bring to the attention of the medical and research communities that the strengths and advantages of using data from high-throughput studies for biomarker discovery would be increased dramatically, if first and second trimester samples were collected for proteomics, and if standardized guidelines for patient reporting and data collection were implemented.