IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0214057.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of information about the benefits and harms of mammography on women’s decision making: The InforMa randomised controlled trial

Author

Listed:
  • María José Pérez-Lacasta
  • Montserrat Martínez-Alonso
  • Montse Garcia
  • Maria Sala
  • Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez
  • Carmen Vidal
  • Núria Codern-Bové
  • Maria Feijoo-Cid
  • Ana Toledo-Chávarri
  • Àngels Cardona
  • Anna Pons
  • Misericòrdia Carles-Lavila
  • Montserrat Rue
  • with the InforMa Group

Abstract

Background: In Spain, women invited to breast screening are not usually informed about potential harms of screening. The objective of the InforMa study is to assess the effect of receiving information about the benefits and harms of breast screening on informed choice and other decision-making outcomes, in women approaching the age of invitation to mammography screening. Methods: Two-stage randomised controlled trial. In the first stage, 40 elementary territorial units of the public healthcare system were selected and randomised to intervention or control. In the second stage, women aged 49-50 years were randomly selected. The target sample size was 400 women. Women in the intervention arm received a decision aid (DA) with detailed information on the benefits and harms of screening. Women in the control arm received a standard leaflet that did not mention harms and recommended accepting the invitation to participate in the Breast Cancer Screening Program (BCSP). The primary outcome was informed choice, defined as adequate knowledge and intentions consistent with attitudes. Secondary outcomes included decisional conflict, worry about breast cancer, time perspective, opinions about the DA or the leaflet, and participation in the BCSP. Results: In the intervention group, 23.2% of 203 women made an informed choice compared to only 0.5% of 197 women in the control group (p

Suggested Citation

  • María José Pérez-Lacasta & Montserrat Martínez-Alonso & Montse Garcia & Maria Sala & Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez & Carmen Vidal & Núria Codern-Bové & Maria Feijoo-Cid & Ana Toledo-Chávarri & Àngels Card, 2019. "Effect of information about the benefits and harms of mammography on women’s decision making: The InforMa randomised controlled trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-20, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0214057
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0214057
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0214057&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0214057?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0214057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.