IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0213698.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Step Test Evaluation of Performance on Stairs (STEPS): Validation and reliability in a neurological disorder

Author

Listed:
  • Anne D Kloos
  • Deb A Kegelmeyer
  • Katherine Ambrogi
  • David Kline
  • Meredith McCormack-Mager
  • Brittany Schroeder
  • Sandra K Kostyk

Abstract

Background: Individuals with neurological disorders often have difficulty negotiating stairs that can lead to injurious falls. Clinicians lack a clinical tool to identify impairments in stair negotiation and to assist their decision making regarding treatment plans to improve stair performance and safety. We developed a new tool called the Step Test Evaluation of Performance on Stairs (STEPS) that is designed to assess stair performance and safety in neurological populations. Objectives: This study aimed to determine interrater and intrarater reliability of STEPS and its concurrent content validity to various clinical balance and mobility measures using individuals with Huntington’s disease (HD) as the first test population. Methods: Forty individuals with HD (mean age 50.35) participated. Three observers rated live performances of the STEPS (interrater reliability) and seven observers rated videotaped performances twice (intrarater reliability). STEPS scores correlated with clinical mobility and balance test scores. Results: Excellent inter- and intrarater reliability (ICCs = 0.91 and 0.89 respectively) and good internal consistency (α = 0.83) were found. Better STEPS performance correlated with better performance on co-administered motor and mobility measures and Stair Self-Efficacy scores. Per multivariable regression analysis, the Unified Huntington’s Disease Rating Scale modified motor score and descent time were significant predictors of STEPS performance. Conclusions: The STEPS tool is easy to administer, requires no special devices and can be completed in less than five minutes. In the HD test population, it shows high reliability and validity making it a potentially useful tool for assessing maneuverability and safety on stairs in HD. The results suggest that the STEPS tool warrants further study to determine STEPS cut-off values for fall prediction in HD and may prove useful as an assessment tool for other neurological disorders.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne D Kloos & Deb A Kegelmeyer & Katherine Ambrogi & David Kline & Meredith McCormack-Mager & Brittany Schroeder & Sandra K Kostyk, 2019. "The Step Test Evaluation of Performance on Stairs (STEPS): Validation and reliability in a neurological disorder," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-12, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0213698
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213698
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0213698
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0213698&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0213698?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0213698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.