IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0213358.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

General practitioners’ willingness to participate in research: A survey in central Switzerland

Author

Listed:
  • Serlha Tawo
  • Sileni Gasser
  • Armin Gemperli
  • Christoph Merlo
  • Stefan Essig

Abstract

It is difficult to enlist the participation of medical general practitioners (GPs) in research studies. We aimed to determine the willingness of GPs in central Switzerland to participate in research, and to identify factors that facilitate or hinder research participation by GPs. To that end, we conducted a postal questionnaire survey of all 268 active GPs in the canton of Lucerne. The survey explored their interest in participating in research projects (yes/no) and factors that potentially influence their participation (5-point Likert scale from “very important” to “not at all important”). We contacted all non-responders by phone. Background information of the GPs was retrieved from the database of the cantonal association of physicians. Associations between willingness to participate in research and GP’s age, gender, type and location of practice, and the perceived relevance of facilitators were investigated via multiple logistic regression. Out of 268 GPs, 115 (43%) agreed to be contacted for future research projects. Willingness was associated with age (willing: 55% ≤ 40 y vs. 33% > 60 y) and gender (44% male vs. 38% female), and to some degree with the type of practice (50% group vs. 31% single), and location (46% urban vs. 38% rural), independently from each other. Scientists should develop methods to motivate and support GPs in single and rural practices to participate so research is representative of primary care as a whole.

Suggested Citation

  • Serlha Tawo & Sileni Gasser & Armin Gemperli & Christoph Merlo & Stefan Essig, 2019. "General practitioners’ willingness to participate in research: A survey in central Switzerland," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-10, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0213358
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0213358
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0213358&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0213358?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seng Fah Tong & Chirk Jenn Ng & Verna Kar Mun Lee & Ping Yein Lee & Irmi Zarina Ismail & Ee Ming Khoo & Noor Azizah Tahir & Iliza Idris & Mastura Ismail & Adina Abdullah, 2018. "Decision making process and factors contributing to research participation among general practitioners: A grounded theory study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joseph Ouma Oindo, 2021. "Engaging in and Coping with Bribery by the Bodaboda Riders in Kisii town, Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(3), pages 351-357, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0213358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.