IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0213077.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The validity, reliability and minimal clinically important difference of the patient specific functional scale in snake envenomation

Author

Listed:
  • Charles J Gerardo
  • Joao R N Vissoci
  • Leonardo P de Oliveira
  • Victoria E Anderson
  • Eugenia Quackenbush
  • Brandon Lewis
  • S Rutherfoord Rose
  • Spencer Greene
  • Eric A Toschlog
  • Nathan P Charlton
  • Michael E Mullins
  • Richard Schwartz
  • David Denning
  • Kapil Sharma
  • Kurt Kleinschmidt
  • Sean P Bush
  • Nicklaus P Brandehoff
  • Eric J Lavonas

Abstract

Objective: Valid, reliable, and clinically relevant outcome measures are necessary in clinical studies of snake envenomation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric (validity and reliability) and clinimetric (minimal clinically important difference [MCID]) properties of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) in snakebite envenomation. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of two existing snakebite trials that measured clinical outcomes using the PSFS as well as other quality of life and functional assessments. Data were collected at 3, 7, 10, and 17 days. Reliability was determined using Cronbach’s alpha for internal consistency and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for temporal stability at 10 and 17 days. Validity was assessed using concurrent validity correlating with the other assessments. The MCID was evaluated using the following criteria: (1) the distribution of stable patients according to both standard error of measurement (SEM) and responsiveness techniques, and (2) anchor-based methods to compare between individuals and to detect discriminant ability of a positive change with a receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve and optimal cutoff point. Results: A total of 86 patients were evaluated in this study. The average PSFS scores were 5.37 (SD 3.23), 7.95 (SD 2.22), and 9.12 (SD 1.37) at 3, 7, and 10 days, respectively. Negligible floor effect was observed (maximum of 8% at 3 days); however, a ceiling effect was observed at 17 days (25%). The PSFS showed good reliability with an internal consistency of 0.91 (Cronbach’s alpha) (95% CI 0.88, 0.95) and a temporal stability of 0.83 (ICC) (95% CI 0.72, 0.89). The PSFS showed a strong positive correlation with quality of life and functional assessments. The MCID was approximately 1.0 for all methods. Conclusions: With an MCID of approximately 1 point, the PSFS is a valid and reliable tool to assess quality of life and functionality in patients with snake envenomation.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles J Gerardo & Joao R N Vissoci & Leonardo P de Oliveira & Victoria E Anderson & Eugenia Quackenbush & Brandon Lewis & S Rutherfoord Rose & Spencer Greene & Eric A Toschlog & Nathan P Charlton & , 2019. "The validity, reliability and minimal clinically important difference of the patient specific functional scale in snake envenomation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0213077
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0213077
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0213077&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0213077?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0213077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.