IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0213013.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reproducible big data science: A case study in continuous FAIRness

Author

Listed:
  • Ravi Madduri
  • Kyle Chard
  • Mike D’Arcy
  • Segun C Jung
  • Alexis Rodriguez
  • Dinanath Sulakhe
  • Eric Deutsch
  • Cory Funk
  • Ben Heavner
  • Matthew Richards
  • Paul Shannon
  • Gustavo Glusman
  • Nathan Price
  • Carl Kesselman
  • Ian Foster

Abstract

Big biomedical data create exciting opportunities for discovery, but make it difficult to capture analyses and outputs in forms that are findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR). In response, we describe tools that make it easy to capture, and assign identifiers to, data and code throughout the data lifecycle. We illustrate the use of these tools via a case study involving a multi-step analysis that creates an atlas of putative transcription factor binding sites from terabytes of ENCODE DNase I hypersensitive sites sequencing data. We show how the tools automate routine but complex tasks, capture analysis algorithms in understandable and reusable forms, and harness fast networks and powerful cloud computers to process data rapidly, all without sacrificing usability or reproducibility—thus ensuring that big data are not hard-to-(re)use data. We evaluate our approach via a user study, and show that 91% of participants were able to replicate a complex analysis involving considerable data volumes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ravi Madduri & Kyle Chard & Mike D’Arcy & Segun C Jung & Alexis Rodriguez & Dinanath Sulakhe & Eric Deutsch & Cory Funk & Ben Heavner & Matthew Richards & Paul Shannon & Gustavo Glusman & Nathan Price, 2019. "Reproducible big data science: A case study in continuous FAIRness," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0213013
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0213013
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0213013&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0213013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0213013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.