IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0210129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and characteristics of the Provincial Overdose Cohort in British Columbia, Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Laura MacDougall
  • Kate Smolina
  • Michael Otterstatter
  • Bin Zhao
  • Mei Chong
  • David Godfrey
  • Ali Mussavi-Rizi
  • Jenny Sutherland
  • Margot Kuo
  • Perry Kendall

Abstract

Introduction: British Columbia (BC), Canada declared a public health emergency in April 2016 for opioid overdose. Comprehensive data was needed to identify risk factors, inform interventions, and evaluate response actions. We describe the development of an overdose cohort, including linkage strategy, case definitions, and data governance model, and present the resulting characteristics, including data linkage yields and case overlap among data sources. Methods: Overdose events from hospital admissions, physician visits, poison centre and ambulance calls, emergency department visits, and coroner’s data were grouped into episodes if records were present in multiple sources. A minimum of five years of universal health care records (all prescription dispensations, fee-for-service physician billings, emergency department visits and hospitalizations) were appended for each individual. A 20% random sample of BC residents and a 1:5 matched case-control set were generated. Consultation and prioritization ensured analysts worked to address questions to directly inform public health actions. Results: 10,456 individuals suffered 14,292 overdoses from January 1, 2015 to Nov 30, 2016. Only 28% of overdose events were found in more than one dataset with the unique contribution of cases highest from ambulance records (32%). Compared with fatal overdoses, non-fatal events more often involved females, younger individuals (20 to 29 years) and those 60 or older. In 78% of illegal drug deaths, there was no associated ambulance response. In the year prior to first recorded overdose, 60% of individuals had at least one ED visit, 31% at least one hospital admission, 80% at least one physician visit, and 87% had filled at least one prescription in a community pharmacy. Conclusion: While resource-intensive to establish, a linked cohort is useful for characterizing the full extent of the epidemic, defining sub-populations at risk, and patterns of contact with the health system. Overdose studies in other jurisdictions should consider the inclusion of multiple data sources.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura MacDougall & Kate Smolina & Michael Otterstatter & Bin Zhao & Mei Chong & David Godfrey & Ali Mussavi-Rizi & Jenny Sutherland & Margot Kuo & Perry Kendall, 2019. "Development and characteristics of the Provincial Overdose Cohort in British Columbia, Canada," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0210129
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0210129
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0210129&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0210129?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0210129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.