IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0210127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging feature tracking: Impact of training on observer performance and reproducibility

Author

Listed:
  • Sören J Backhaus
  • Georg Metschies
  • Marcus Billing
  • Johannes T Kowallick
  • Roman J Gertz
  • Tomas Lapinskas
  • Burkert Pieske
  • Joachim Lotz
  • Boris Bigalke
  • Shelby Kutty
  • Gerd Hasenfuß
  • Philipp Beerbaum
  • Sebastian Kelle
  • Andreas Schuster

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT) is increasingly used for myocardial deformation assessment including ventricular strain, showing prognostic value beyond established risk markers if used in experienced centres. Little is known about the impact of appropriate training on CMR-FT performance. Consequently, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of training on observer variance using different commercially available CMR-FT software. Methods: Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility was assessed prior to and after dedicated one-hour observer training. Employed FT software included 3 different commercially available platforms (TomTec, Medis, Circle). Left (LV) and right (RV) ventricular global longitudinal as well as LV circumferential and radial strains (GLS, GCS and GRS) were studied in 12 heart failure patients and 12 healthy volunteers. Results: Training improved intra- and inter-observer reproducibility. GCS and LV GLS showed the highest reproducibility before (ICC >0.86 and >0.81) and after training (ICC >0.91 and >0.92). RV GLS and GRS were more susceptible to tracking inaccuracies and reproducibility was lower. Inter-observer reproducibility was lower than intra-observer reproducibility prior to training with more pronounced improvements after training. Before training, LV strain reproducibility was lower in healthy volunteers as compared to patients with no differences after training. Whilst LV strain reproducibility was sufficient within individual software solutions inter-software comparisons revealed considerable software related variance. Conclusion: Observer experience is an important source of variance in CMR-FT derived strain assessment. Dedicated observer training significantly improves reproducibility with most profound benefits in states of high myocardial contractility and potential to facilitate widespread clinical implementation due to optimized robustness and diagnostic performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Sören J Backhaus & Georg Metschies & Marcus Billing & Johannes T Kowallick & Roman J Gertz & Tomas Lapinskas & Burkert Pieske & Joachim Lotz & Boris Bigalke & Shelby Kutty & Gerd Hasenfuß & Philipp Be, 2019. "Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging feature tracking: Impact of training on observer performance and reproducibility," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0210127
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0210127
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0210127&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0210127?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0210127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.