IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0209035.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of a patient-flow physician coordinator on waiting times and length of stay in an emergency department: A before-after cohort study

Author

Listed:
  • Marta Morais Oliveira
  • Christophe Marti
  • Majd Ramlawi
  • François P Sarasin
  • Olivier Grosgurin
  • Pierre-Alexandre Poletti
  • Frédéric Rouyer
  • Olivier T Rutschmann

Abstract

Objective: Overcrowding is common in most emergency departments (ED). Despite the use of validated triage systems, some patients are at risk of delayed medical evaluation. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of a patient-flow physician coordinator (PFPC) on the proportion of patients offered medical evaluation within time limits imposed by the Swiss Emergency Triage Scale (SETS) and on patient flow within the emergency department of a teaching urban hospital. Methods: In this before-after retrospective cohort study, we compared the proportions of patients who received their first medical contact within SETS-imposed time limits, mean waiting times before first medical consultation, mean length of stay, and number of patients who left without being seen by a physician, between two periods before and after introducing a PFPC. The PFPC was a senior physician charged with quickly assessing in the waiting area patients who could not immediately be seen and managing patient flow within the department. Results: Before introducing the PFPC position, 33,605 patients were admitted, versus 36,288 after. Introducing a PFPC enabled the department to increase the proportion of patients seen within the SETS-imposed time limits from 60.1% to 69.0% (p

Suggested Citation

  • Marta Morais Oliveira & Christophe Marti & Majd Ramlawi & François P Sarasin & Olivier Grosgurin & Pierre-Alexandre Poletti & Frédéric Rouyer & Olivier T Rutschmann, 2018. "Impact of a patient-flow physician coordinator on waiting times and length of stay in an emergency department: A before-after cohort study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-8, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0209035
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0209035
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0209035&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0209035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0209035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.