IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0208992.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for preoperative staging of non-small–cell lung cancer: Results of a French prospective multicenter trial (EVIEPEB)

Author

Listed:
  • Christos Chouaid
  • Mathieu Salaün
  • Valérie Gounant
  • Michel Febvre
  • Jean-Michel Vergnon
  • Vincent Jouniaux
  • Clément Fournier
  • Samy Lachkar
  • Christophe Hermant
  • Christophe Raspaud
  • Xavier Quantin
  • Jean-Jacques Quiot
  • Anita Molard
  • Charles Dayen
  • Charles-Hugo Marquette
  • Hervé Lena
  • Gérard Zalcman
  • Luc Thiberville

Abstract

This two-step study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for presurgery staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in France (EVIEPEB; ClinicalTrial.gov identifier NCT00960271).Step 1 consisted of a high-benchmark EBUS-TBNA–training program in participating hospital centers. Step 2 was a prospective, national, multicenter study on patients with confirmed or suspected NSCLC and an indication for mediastinal staging with at least one lymph node > 1 cm in diameter. Patients with negative or uninformative EBUS-TBNA and positron-emission tomography-positive or -negative nodes, respectively, underwent either mediastinoscopy or surgery. Direct costs related to final diagnosis of node status were prospectively recorded.Sixteen of 22 participating centers were certified by the EBUS-TBNA–training program and enrolled 163 patients in Step 2. EBUS-TBNA was informative for 149 (91%) patients (75 malignant, 74 non-malignant) and uninformative for 14 (9%). Mediastinoscopy was avoided for 80% of the patients. With a 52% malignant-node rate, EBUS-TBNA positive- and negative-predictive values, respectively, were 100% and 90%. EBUS-TBNA was cost-effective, with expected savings of €1,450 per patient, and would have remained cost-effective even if all EBUS-TBNAs had been performed under general anesthesia or the cost of the procedure had been 30% higher (expected cost-saving of €994 and €1,427 per patient, respectively).After EBUS-TBNA training and certification of participating centers, the results of this prospective multicenter study confirmed EBUS-TBNA cost-effectiveness for NSCLC staging.

Suggested Citation

  • Christos Chouaid & Mathieu Salaün & Valérie Gounant & Michel Febvre & Jean-Michel Vergnon & Vincent Jouniaux & Clément Fournier & Samy Lachkar & Christophe Hermant & Christophe Raspaud & Xavier Quanti, 2019. "Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for preoperative staging of non-small–cell lung cancer: Results of a French prospective mul," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0208992
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208992
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0208992
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0208992&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0208992?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0208992. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.