IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0207572.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Provider knowledge and performance in medication injection safety in anesthesia: A mixed method prospective crosses sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Hasan Yusefzadeh
  • Alireza Didarloo
  • Bahram Nabilou

Abstract

Objectives: Injection safety during anesthesia is a challenging health care issue in Iranian hospitals. Anesthesia is one of the most medication-intensive procedures in healthcare and injecting patients are an integral part of that care. The present study aimed to assess the status of medication injection safety practice in a teaching center. Design, setting, participants: A prospective cross-sectional study was done in 2014–2015 at a 500-bed secondary level teaching hospital affiliated with Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Iran. The study population included providers of anesthesia in two groups of operating rooms (ORs) with different types of surgeries at the center. Data were collected using valid and reliable observation and a questionnaire instruments in two consecutive phases. Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, and Spearman correlation tests were used for data analyses. Results: A total of 345 injections were observed and recorded during the study period, 53% in group A ORs, and 47% in group B ORs. Eighty-two questionnaires were completed (96.5% response rate) to determine hospital injection practices and personal knowledge of injection safety. Adherence to safety requirements was observed in 58.5% of injections. Fifty five percent of respondents knew that hepatitis B, C, and HIV are blood borne diseases. Observed compliance with injection safety requirements was determined significant by OR groups (P = 0.00). Correlation was significant between observed injection safety practices by age and work experience (P = 0.00). The Kruskal-Wallis test showed a significant difference (P = 0.000) in observed safe injection practices among four job groups but not in reported adherence. Knowledge of respondents was significant by job groups about blood borne diseases and receiving three doses of hepatitis B vaccine. Conclusions: The study revealed that some of safe injection procedures were well carried out in our ORs, but that others were not. The reported adherence of staff was acceptable but their actual practices were unsafe. It is suggested to implement audits, provide safer supplies, and complete Hepatitis B vaccination of injection providers.

Suggested Citation

  • Hasan Yusefzadeh & Alireza Didarloo & Bahram Nabilou, 2018. "Provider knowledge and performance in medication injection safety in anesthesia: A mixed method prospective crosses sectional study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0207572
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207572
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0207572
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0207572&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0207572?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0207572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.