IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0207418.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Computerization and the future of primary care: A survey of general practitioners in the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Charlotte Blease
  • Michael H Bernstein
  • Jens Gaab
  • Ted J Kaptchuk
  • Joe Kossowsky
  • Kenneth D Mandl
  • Roger B Davis
  • Catherine M DesRoches

Abstract

Objective: To describe the opinions of British general practitioners regarding the potential of future technology to replace key tasks carried out in primary care. Design: Cross sectional online survey. Participants: 1,474 registered GPs in the United Kingdom. Main outcome measures: Investigators measured GPs’ opinions about the likelihood that future technology will be able to fully replace–not merely aid–the average GP in performing six primary care tasks; in addition, if GPs considered replacement for a particular task likely, the survey measured opinions about how many years from now this technological capacity might emerge. Results: A total of 720 (49%) responded to the survey. Most GPs believed it unlikely that technology will ever be able to fully replace physicians when it comes to diagnosing patients (489, 68%), referring patients to other specialists (444, 61%), formulating personalized treatment plans (441, 61%), and delivering empathic care (680, 94%). GPs were not in agreement about prognostics: one in two participants (380, 53%) considered it likely that technology will be fully capable of replacing physicians in performing this task, nearly half (187, 49%) of whom believed that the technological capacity will arise in the next ten years. Against these findings, the majority of GPs (578, 80%) believed it likely that future technology will be able to fully replace humans to undertake documentation; among them 261 (79%) estimated that the technological wherewithal would emerge during the next ten years. In general, age and gender were not correlated with opinions; nor was reported burnout and job satisfaction or whether GPs worked full time or part time. Conclusions: The majority of UK GPs in this survey were skeptical about the potential for future technology to perform most primary care tasks as well as or better than humans. However, respondents were optimistic that in the near future technology would have the capacity to fully replace GPs’ in undertaking administrative duties related to patient documentation.

Suggested Citation

  • Charlotte Blease & Michael H Bernstein & Jens Gaab & Ted J Kaptchuk & Joe Kossowsky & Kenneth D Mandl & Roger B Davis & Catherine M DesRoches, 2018. "Computerization and the future of primary care: A survey of general practitioners in the UK," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0207418
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0207418
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0207418&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0207418?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0207418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.