IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0206473.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A stepped wedge cluster randomised trial of nurse-delivered Teach-Back in a consumer telehealth service

Author

Listed:
  • Suzanne Morony
  • Kristie R Weir
  • Katy J L Bell
  • Janice Biggs
  • Gregory Duncan
  • Don Nutbeam
  • Kirsten J McCaffery

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of Teach-Back on communication quality in a national telephone-based telehealth service, for callers varying in health literacy. Design: Cross-sectional stepped wedge cluster randomised trial with continuous recruitment, short (fixed) exposure and blinded outcome assessors. Nurses were stratified by hours worked and randomised into training groups using a computer generated sequence. Setting: An Australian national pregnancy and parenting telephone helpline. Intervention: Complex intervention involving a single 2-hour group Teach-Back training session, combined with ongoing nurse self-reflection on their communication following each call and each shift. Participants: Participants were 637 callers to the telephone helpline aged 18–75 (87% female), of whom 127 (13%) had inadequate health literacy (measured with the Single Item Literacy Screener); and 15 maternal and child health nurses with 15 years’ experience on average. Measures: Primary outcome was a modified subscale of the Health Literacy Questionnaire, ‘having sufficient information to manage health’. Secondary caller outcomes included caller confidence, perceived actionability of information and nurse effort to listen and understand. Nurse outcomes were perceptions of their communication effectiveness. Results: Over a 7 week period, 376 surveyed callers received usual care and 261 Teach-Back. Ratings on the primary outcome increased over time (OR 1.17, CI 1.01 to 1.32, p = 0.03) but no independent Teach-Back effect was observed. A consistent pattern suggests that, compared with usual care, Teach-Back helps callers with inadequate health literacy feel listened to (OR 2.3, CI 0.98 to 5.42, p = 0.06), confident to act (OR 2.44, CI 1.00 to 5.98, p = 0.06), and know what steps to take (OR 2.68, CI 1.00 to 7.17, p = 0.06). Nurse perceptions of both their own communication effectiveness (OR = 2.31; CI 1.38 to 3.86, p

Suggested Citation

  • Suzanne Morony & Kristie R Weir & Katy J L Bell & Janice Biggs & Gregory Duncan & Don Nutbeam & Kirsten J McCaffery, 2018. "A stepped wedge cluster randomised trial of nurse-delivered Teach-Back in a consumer telehealth service," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0206473
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206473
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0206473
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0206473&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0206473?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0206473. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.