IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0204801.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perspectives of healthcare professionals in Qatar on causes of medication errors: A mixed methods study of safety culture

Author

Listed:
  • Derek Stewart
  • Binny Thomas
  • Katie MacLure
  • Abdulrouf Pallivalapila
  • Wessam El Kassem
  • Ahmed Awaisu
  • James S McLay
  • Kerry Wilbur
  • Kyle Wilby
  • Cristin Ryan
  • Andrea Dijkstra
  • Rajvir Singh
  • Moza Al Hail

Abstract

Background: There is a lack of robust, rigorous mixed methods studies of patient safety culture generally and notably those which incorporate behavioural theories of change. The study aimed to quantify and explain key aspects of patient safety culture which were of most concern to healthcare professionals in Qatar. Methods: A sequential explanatory mixed methods design of a cross-sectional survey followed by focus groups in Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar. All doctors, nurses and pharmacists were invited to complete the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPS). Respondents expressing interest in focus group participation were sampled purposively, and discussions based on survey findings using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to explain behavioural determinants. Results: One thousand, six hundred and four questionnaires were received (67.9% nurses, 13.3% doctors, 12.9% pharmacists). HSOPS composites with the lowest levels of positive responses were non-punitive response to errors (24.0% positive) and staffing (36.2%). Specific TDF determinants potentially associated with these composites were social/professional role and identity, emotions, and environmental context and resources. Thematic analysis identified issues of doctors relying on pharmacists to correct their errors and being reluctant to alter the prescribing of fellow doctors. There was a lack of recognition of nurses’ roles and frequent policy non-adherence. Stress, workload and lack of staff at key times were perceived to be major contributors to errors. Conclusions: This study has quantified areas of concern relating to patient safety culture in Qatar and suggested important behavioural determinants. Rather than focusing on changing behaviour at the individual practitioner level, action may be required at the organisational strategic level to review policies, structures (including resource allocation and distribution) and processes which aim to promote patient safety culture.

Suggested Citation

  • Derek Stewart & Binny Thomas & Katie MacLure & Abdulrouf Pallivalapila & Wessam El Kassem & Ahmed Awaisu & James S McLay & Kerry Wilbur & Kyle Wilby & Cristin Ryan & Andrea Dijkstra & Rajvir Singh & M, 2018. "Perspectives of healthcare professionals in Qatar on causes of medication errors: A mixed methods study of safety culture," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0204801
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204801
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0204801
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0204801&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0204801?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0204801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.