IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0201258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

To be funny or not to be funny: Gender differences in student perceptions of instructor humor in college science courses

Author

Listed:
  • Katelyn M Cooper
  • Taija Hendrix
  • Michelle D Stephens
  • Jacqueline M Cala
  • Kali Mahrer
  • Anna Krieg
  • Ashley C M Agloro
  • Giovani V Badini
  • M Elizabeth Barnes
  • Bradley Eledge
  • Roxann Jones
  • Edmond C Lemon
  • Nicholas C Massimo
  • Annette Martin
  • Thomas Ruberto
  • Kailey Simonson
  • Emily A Webb
  • Joseph Weaver
  • Yi Zheng
  • Sara E Brownell

Abstract

For over 50 years instructor humor has been recognized as a way to positively impact student cognitive and affective learning. However, no study has explored humor exclusively in the context of college science courses, which have the reputation of being difficult and boring. The majority of studies that explore humor have assumed that students perceive instructor humor to be funny, yet students likely perceive some instructor humor as unfunny or offensive. Further, evidence suggests that women perceive certain subjects to be more offensive than men, yet we do not know what impact this may have on the experience of women in the classroom. To address these gaps in the literature, we surveyed students across 25 different college science courses about their perceptions of instructor humor in college science classes, which yielded 1637 student responses. Open-coding methods were used to analyze student responses to a question about why students appreciate humor. Multinomial regression was used to identify whether there are gender differences in the extent to which funny, unfunny, and offensive humor influenced student attention to course content, instructor relatability, and student sense of belonging. Logistic regression was used to examine gender differences in what subjects students find funny and offensive when joked about by college science instructors. Nearly 99% of students reported that they appreciate instructor humor and reported that it positively changes the classroom atmosphere, improves student experiences during class, and enhances the student-instructor relationship. We found that funny humor tends to increase student attention to course content, instructor relatability, and student sense of belonging. Conversely, offensive humor tends to decrease instructor relatability and student sense of belonging. Lastly, we identified subjects that males were more likely to find funny and females were more likely to find offensive if a college science instructor were to joke about them.

Suggested Citation

  • Katelyn M Cooper & Taija Hendrix & Michelle D Stephens & Jacqueline M Cala & Kali Mahrer & Anna Krieg & Ashley C M Agloro & Giovani V Badini & M Elizabeth Barnes & Bradley Eledge & Roxann Jones & Edmo, 2018. "To be funny or not to be funny: Gender differences in student perceptions of instructor humor in college science courses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-24, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0201258
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0201258
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0201258&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0201258?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0201258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.