IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0201140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Case-control studies of gene-environment interactions. When a case might not be the case

Author

Listed:
  • Iryna Lobach
  • Joshua Sampson
  • Alexander Alekseyenko
  • Siarhei Lobach
  • Li Zhang

Abstract

Case-control Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) provide a rich resource for studying the genetic architecture of complex diseases. A key is to elucidate how the genetic effects vary by the environment, what is traditionally defined by Gene-Environment interactions (GxE). The overlooked complication is that multiple, distinct pathophysiologic mechanisms may lead to the same clinical diagnosis and often these mechanisms have distinct genetic bases. In this paper, we first show that using the clinically diagnosed status can lead to severely biased estimates of GxE interactions in situations when the frequency of the pathologic diagnosis of interest, as compared to other diagnoses, depends on the environment. We then propose a pseudo-likelihood solution to correct the bias. Finally, we demonstrate our method in extensive simulations and in a GWAS of Alzheimer’s disease.

Suggested Citation

  • Iryna Lobach & Joshua Sampson & Alexander Alekseyenko & Siarhei Lobach & Li Zhang, 2018. "Case-control studies of gene-environment interactions. When a case might not be the case," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0201140
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0201140
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0201140&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0201140?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0201140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.