IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0201013.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A 3D two-point method for whole-brain water content and relaxation time mapping: Comparison with gold standard methods

Author

Listed:
  • Melissa Schall
  • Markus Zimmermann
  • Elene Iordanishvili
  • Yun Gu
  • N Jon Shah
  • Ana-Maria Oros-Peusquens

Abstract

Quantitative imaging of the human brain is of great interest in clinical research as it enables the identification of a range of MR biomarkers useful in diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of a wide spectrum of diseases. Here, a 3D two-point method for water content and relaxation time mapping is presented and compared to established gold standard methods. The method determines free water content, H2O, and the longitudinal relaxation time, T1, quantitatively from a two-point fit to the signal equation including corrections of the transmit and receive fields. In addition, the effective transverse relaxation time, T2*, is obtained from an exponential fit to the multi-echo signal train and its influence on H2O values is corrected. The phantom results obtained with the proposed method show good agreement for H2O and T1 values with known and spectroscopically measured values, respectively. The method is compared in vivo to already established gold standard quantitative methods. For H2O and T2* mapping, the 3D two-point results were compared to a measurement conducted with a multiple-echo GRE with long TR and T1 is compared to results from a Look-Locker method, TAPIR. In vivo results show good overall agreement between the methods, but some systematic deviations are present. Besides an expected dependence of T2* on voxel size, T1 values are systematically larger in the 3D approach than those obtained with the gold standard method. This behaviour might be due to imperfect spoiling, influencing each method differently. Results for H2O differ due to differences in the saturation of cerebrospinal fluid and partial volume effects. In addition, ground truth values of in vivo studies are unknown, even when comparing to in vivo gold standard methods. A detailed region-of-interest analysis for H2O and T1 matches well published literature values.

Suggested Citation

  • Melissa Schall & Markus Zimmermann & Elene Iordanishvili & Yun Gu & N Jon Shah & Ana-Maria Oros-Peusquens, 2018. "A 3D two-point method for whole-brain water content and relaxation time mapping: Comparison with gold standard methods," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0201013
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0201013
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0201013&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0201013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0201013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.