IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0198979.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systematic review on barriers and enablers for access to diabetic retinopathy screening services in different income settings

Author

Listed:
  • Mapa Mudiyanselage Prabhath Nishantha Piyasena
  • Gudlavalleti Venkata S Murthy
  • Jennifer L Y Yip
  • Clare Gilbert
  • Maria Zuurmond
  • Tunde Peto
  • Iris Gordon
  • Suwin Hewage
  • Sureshkumar Kamalakannan

Abstract

Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) can lead to visual impairment and blindness if not detected and treated in time. Knowing the barriers/enablers in advance in contrasting different country income settings may accelerate development of a successful DR screening (DRS) program. This would be especially applicable in the low-income settings with the rising prevalence of DR. Objectives: The aim of this systematic review is to identify and contrast the barriers/enablers to DRS for different contexts using both consumers i.e., people with diabetes (PwDM) and provider perspectives and system level factors in different country income settings. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL in the Cochrane Library from the databases start date to December 2018. We included the studies reported on barriers and enablers to access DRS services based at health care facilities. We categorised and synthesized themes related to the consumers (individuals), providers and the health systems (environment) as main dimensions according to the constructs of social cognitive theory, supported by the quantitative measures i.e., odds ratios as reported by each of the study authors. Main results: We included 77 studies primarily describing the barriers and enablers. Most of the studies were from high income settings (72.7%, 56/77) and cross sectional in design (76.6%, 59/77). From the perspectives of consumers, lack of knowledge, attitude, awareness and motivation were identified as major barriers. The enablers were fear of blindness, proximity of screening facility, experiences of vision loss and being concerned of eye complications. In providers’ perspectives, lack of skilled human resources, training programs, infrastructure of retinal imaging and cost of services were the main barriers. Higher odds of uptake of DRS services was observed when PwDM were provided health education (odds ratio (OR) 4.3) and having knowledge on DR (OR range 1.3–19.7). Conclusion: Knowing the barriers to access DRS is a pre-requisite in development of a successful screening program. The awareness, knowledge and attitude of the consumers, availability of skilled human resources and infrastructure emerged as the major barriers to access to DRS in any income setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Mapa Mudiyanselage Prabhath Nishantha Piyasena & Gudlavalleti Venkata S Murthy & Jennifer L Y Yip & Clare Gilbert & Maria Zuurmond & Tunde Peto & Iris Gordon & Suwin Hewage & Sureshkumar Kamalakannan, 2019. "Systematic review on barriers and enablers for access to diabetic retinopathy screening services in different income settings," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-29, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0198979
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198979
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0198979
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0198979&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0198979?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Basch, C.E. & Walker, E.A. & Howard, C.J. & Shamoon, H. & Zybert, P., 1999. "The effect of health education on the rate of ophthalmic examinations among African Americans with diabetes mellitus," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 89(12), pages 1878-1882.
    2. Hofer, T.P. & Katz, S.J., 1996. "Healthy behaviors among women in the United States and Ontario: The effect on use of preventive care," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 86(12), pages 1755-1759.
    3. Daniel Kreft & Myra B McGuinness & Gabriele Doblhammer & Robert P Finger, 2018. "Diabetic retinopathy screening in incident diabetes mellitus type 2 in Germany between 2004 and 2013 - A prospective cohort study based on health claims data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mar Blasco-Blasco & Marta Puig-García & Nora Piay & Blanca Lumbreras & Ildefonso Hernández-Aguado & Lucy Anne Parker, 2020. "Barriers and facilitators to successful management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Latin America and the Caribbean: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Stevens Bechange & Anne Roca & Elena Schmidt & Munazza Gillani & Leena Ahmed & Robina Iqbal & Imran Nazir & Anna Ruddock & Muhammed Bilal & Itfaq Khaliq Khan & Sandeep Buttan & Emma Jolley, 2021. "Diabetic retinopathy service delivery and integration into the health system in Pakistan—Findings from a multicentre qualitative study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-20, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aniko Biro;, 2012. "An analysis of mammography decisions with a focus on educational differences," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 12/11, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    2. Anikó Bíró, 2013. "Discount Rates And The Education Gradient In Mammography In The Uk," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(9), pages 1021-1036, September.
    3. Zara Khair & Md Moshiur Rahman & Kana Kazawa & Yasmin Jahan & Abu S G Faruque & Mohammod Jobayer Chisti & Michiko Moriyama, 2020. "Health education improves referral compliance of persons with probable Diabetic Retinopathy: A randomized controlled trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Myoung‐Jae Lee & Satoru Kobayashi, 2001. "Proportional treatment effects for count response panel data: effects of binary exercise on health care demand," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(5), pages 411-428, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0198979. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.