IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0197250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aging-related trajectories of lung function in the general population—The Doetinchem Cohort Study

Author

Listed:
  • Sandra H van Oostrom
  • Peter M Engelfriet
  • W M Monique Verschuren
  • Maarten Schipper
  • Inge M Wouters
  • Marike Boezen
  • Henriëtte A Smit
  • Huib A M Kerstjens
  • H Susan J Picavet

Abstract

The objective of this study was to explore trajectories of lung function decline with age in the general population, and to study the effect of sociodemographic and life style related risk factors, in particular smoking and BMI. For this purpose, we used data from the Doetinchem Cohort Study (DCS) of men and women, selected randomly from the general population and aged 20–59 years at inclusion in 1987–1991, and followed until the present. Participants in the DCS are assessed every five years. Spirometry has been performed as part of this assessment from 1994 onwards. Participants were included in this study if spirometric measurement of FEV1, which in this study was the main parameter of interest, was acceptable and reproducible on at least one measurement round, leading to the inclusion of 5727 individuals (3008 females). Statistical analysis revealed three typical trajectories. The majority of participants followed a trajectory that closely adhered to the Global Lung Initiative Reference values (94.9% of men and 96.4% of women). Two other trajectories showed a more pronounced decline. Smoking and the presence of respiratory complaints were the best predictors of a trajectory with stronger decline. A greater BMI over the follow-up period was associated with a more unfavorable FEV1 course both in men (β = -0.027 (SD = 0.002); P

Suggested Citation

  • Sandra H van Oostrom & Peter M Engelfriet & W M Monique Verschuren & Maarten Schipper & Inge M Wouters & Marike Boezen & Henriëtte A Smit & Huib A M Kerstjens & H Susan J Picavet, 2018. "Aging-related trajectories of lung function in the general population—The Doetinchem Cohort Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0197250
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0197250
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0197250&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0197250?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0197250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.