IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0195806.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Association between vision-specific quality of life and falls in community-dwelling older adults: LOHAS

Author

Listed:
  • Kakuya Niihata
  • Shingo Fukuma
  • Yoshimune Hiratsuka
  • Koichi Ono
  • Masakazu Yamada
  • Miho Sekiguchi
  • Koji Otani
  • Shinichi Kikuchi
  • Shinichi Konno
  • Shunichi Fukuhara

Abstract

Background: Falls and fall-related fractures are a major public health problem among the older adults. Although objective measures of poor vision have been reported to be associated with falls, the association of self-reported visual function and vision-specific quality of life (QOL) with falls has been inconsistent across several studies. We investigated the association of self-reported visual function and vision specific QOL with falls in community-dwelling older adults. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using the baseline data from participants of the Locomotive Syndrome and Health Outcome in Aizu Cohort Study (LOHAS), which is an ongoing population-based cohort study to evaluate the association of physical dysfunction with the clinical outcomes in community-dwelling people. In the present study, the participants aged over 65 years in 2010 were eligible. The exposure variable was the composite score of the VFQ-J11, which was newly developed using item response theory to evaluate vision specific QOL, and the self-reported outcomes were any fall and frequent falls (≥2) over a 1-month period. We estimated odds ratios using separate logistic regression models adjusted for relevant confounding factors. Results: Among 1624 participants, the median (interquartile range) composite score of VFQ-J11 was 86.8 (76.0–95.9). Any fall and frequent falls were reported by 13.9% and 5.4% of participants, respectively. The composite score of the VFQ-J11 was significantly associated with both frequent falls (adjusted ORs per 10 points, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68–0.93) and any fall (adjusted ORs per 10 points, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76–0.94). Conclusions: We found that the composite score of the VFQ-J11 was associated with falls in community-dwelling older adults. Detecting individuals with visual impairments associated with falls using the VFQ-J11 and improvement in the score by interventions could prevent falls. We may consider adding self-reported visual function and vision-specific QOL to conventional risk factors for fall among older adults.

Suggested Citation

  • Kakuya Niihata & Shingo Fukuma & Yoshimune Hiratsuka & Koichi Ono & Masakazu Yamada & Miho Sekiguchi & Koji Otani & Shinichi Kikuchi & Shinichi Konno & Shunichi Fukuhara, 2018. "Association between vision-specific quality of life and falls in community-dwelling older adults: LOHAS," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-11, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0195806
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0195806
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0195806&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0195806?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0195806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.