IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0194938.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Widespread domain-like perturbations of DNA methylation in whole blood of Down syndrome neonates

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Henneman
  • Arjan Bouman
  • Adri Mul
  • Lia Knegt
  • Anne-Marie van der Kevie-Kersemaekers
  • Nitash Zwaveling-Soonawala
  • Hanne E J Meijers-Heijboer
  • A S Paul van Trotsenburg
  • Marcel M Mannens

Abstract

Introduction: Down syndrome (DS) is the most frequent genetic cause of intellectual disability. Despite the fact that more than 50 years have passed since the discovery of its genetic aberrations, the exact pathogenesis of the DS phenotype has remained largely unexplained. It was recently hypothesized that the DS pathogenesis involves complex (epi)genetic, molecular and cellular determinants. To date, many reports have addressed epigenetic aberrations associated with DS at different developmental stages/ages and tissue types, but to our best knowledge not in DS newborns. This study aimed to investigate genome-wide methylation patterns in DS newborns compared to non-trisomic newborns. Method: We analyzed blood samples obtained from ten newborns with DS and five age-matched non-trisomic newborns. Epigenetic profiles were obtained from extracted DNA using the Illumina Infinium 450K array. Since aberrant blood cell distribution is known to be present in DS, we applied two distinct models: with and without correction for estimated blood cell distribution. Results: Differentially methylated position (DMP) analysis of the uncorrected model detected 19525 significant hits (51,2% hypomethylated). In the corrected model, we found 121953 significant DMPs (49,8% hypomethylated). Independent of the used model we observed a chromosome 21 dosage effect. Moreover, we detected 46 and 145 differentially methylated regions in the uncorrected and corrected model respectively, both showing hypomethylation overrepresentation. Replication analyses of DMPs and DMRs found by Bacalini et al. (2015) showed a large overlap. Conclusion: In this study, we found methylation profile differences between DS newborns and controls reflecting a systematically affected epigenetic profile. The observed chromosome 21 dosage effect suggests the involvement of affected essential regulatory factors/regions or altered expression of chromatin modeling enzymes located on chromosome 21. Additional research is necessary to substantiate these hypotheses.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Henneman & Arjan Bouman & Adri Mul & Lia Knegt & Anne-Marie van der Kevie-Kersemaekers & Nitash Zwaveling-Soonawala & Hanne E J Meijers-Heijboer & A S Paul van Trotsenburg & Marcel M Mannens, 2018. "Widespread domain-like perturbations of DNA methylation in whole blood of Down syndrome neonates," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0194938
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194938
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0194938
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0194938&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0194938?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lars Guelen & Ludo Pagie & Emilie Brasset & Wouter Meuleman & Marius B. Faza & Wendy Talhout & Bert H. Eussen & Annelies de Klein & Lodewyk Wessels & Wouter de Laat & Bas van Steensel, 2008. "Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions," Nature, Nature, vol. 453(7197), pages 948-951, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Krivonosov, Mikhail & Nazarenko, Tatiana & Bacalini, Maria Giulia & Vedunova, Maria & Franceschi, Claudio & Zaikin, Alexey & Ivanchenko, Mikhail, 2022. "Age-related trajectories of DNA methylation network markers: A parenclitic network approach to a family-based cohort of patients with Down Syndrome," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 165(P2).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cristiana Bersaglieri & Jelena Kresoja-Rakic & Shivani Gupta & Dominik Bär & Rostyslav Kuzyakiv & Martina Panatta & Raffaella Santoro, 2022. "Genome-wide maps of nucleolus interactions reveal distinct layers of repressive chromatin domains," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Frederic Li Mow Chee & Bruno Beernaert & Billie G. C. Griffith & Alexander E. P. Loftus & Yatendra Kumar & Jimi C. Wills & Martin Lee & Jessica Valli & Ann P. Wheeler & J. Douglas Armstrong & Maddy Pa, 2023. "Mena regulates nesprin-2 to control actin–nuclear lamina associations, trans-nuclear membrane signalling and gene expression," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Meng Zhang & Mary Elisabeth Ehmann & Srija Matukumalli & Aashutosh Girish Boob & David M. Gilbert & Huimin Zhao, 2023. "SHIELD: a platform for high-throughput screening of barrier-type DNA elements in human cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Miguel M. Álvarez & Josep Biayna & Fran Supek, 2022. "TP53-dependent toxicity of CRISPR/Cas9 cuts is differential across genomic loci and can confound genetic screening," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Carlos Díaz-Castillo, 2013. "Females and Males Contribute in Opposite Ways to the Evolution of Gene Order in Drosophila," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-10, May.
    6. Allison P. Siegenfeld & Shelby A. Roseman & Heejin Roh & Nicholas Z. Lue & Corin C. Wagen & Eric Zhou & Sarah E. Johnstone & Martin J. Aryee & Brian B. Liau, 2022. "Polycomb-lamina antagonism partitions heterochromatin at the nuclear periphery," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    7. David E. Torres & H. Martin Kramer & Vittorio Tracanna & Gabriel L. Fiorin & David E. Cook & Michael F. Seidl & Bart P. H. J. Thomma, 2024. "Implications of the three-dimensional chromatin organization for genome evolution in a fungal plant pathogen," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Robert Schöpflin & Uirá Souto Melo & Hossein Moeinzadeh & David Heller & Verena Laupert & Jakob Hertzberg & Manuel Holtgrewe & Nico Alavi & Marius-Konstantin Klever & Julius Jungnitsch & Emel Comak & , 2022. "Integration of Hi-C with short and long-read genome sequencing reveals the structure of germline rearranged genomes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Kaela M. Varberg & Esteban M. Dominguez & Boryana Koseva & Joseph M. Varberg & Ross P. McNally & Ayelen Moreno-Irusta & Emily R. Wesley & Khursheed Iqbal & Warren A. Cheung & Carl Schwendinger-Schreck, 2023. "Extravillous trophoblast cell lineage development is associated with active remodeling of the chromatin landscape," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-23, December.
    10. Judith H. I. Haarhuis & Robin H. Weide & Vincent A. Blomen & Koen D. Flach & Hans Teunissen & Laureen Willems & Thijn R. Brummelkamp & Benjamin D. Rowland & Elzo Wit, 2022. "A Mediator-cohesin axis controls heterochromatin domain formation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0194938. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.