IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0188120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decreased prevalence of cancer in patients with multiple sclerosis: A case-control study

Author

Listed:
  • Xavier Moisset
  • Maud Perié
  • Bruno Pereira
  • Emilie Dumont
  • Christine Lebrun-Frenay
  • François-Xavier Lesage
  • Frederic Dutheil
  • Frederic Taithe
  • Pierre Clavelou

Abstract

Background: Studies of cancer prevalence have produced conflicting results concerning the relative risk of overall and specific sub-types of cancer in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Contemporary controls and information on tobacco use and alcohol consumption are generally missing from previous studies. Objectives: To evaluate lifetime cancer prevalence in a large cohort of MS patients relative to appropriate controls. Methods: We conducted a case-control study, using a postal survey of a cohort of MS patients. Of the 1574 questionnaires sent, 1107 could be used for statistical analysis. Data from 1568 controls were prospectively collected using the same self-administered survey among consecutive out-patients in a single neurology department. Propensity scores matched on age, gender, and history of smoking and alcohol consumption were calculated. Results: Among the MS patients, 7.32% had ever presented with a cancer, whereas 12,63% of the controls had, leading to a bootstrap matched odds ratio (OR) of 0.63; 95% CI 0.57–0.70. Although only exploratory, the use of DMT (immunomodulators or immunosupressants) did not appear to increase this risk (p = 0.42). The disease course also did not affect cancer prevalence. Conclusion: MS was associated with a reduced overall cancer risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Xavier Moisset & Maud Perié & Bruno Pereira & Emilie Dumont & Christine Lebrun-Frenay & François-Xavier Lesage & Frederic Dutheil & Frederic Taithe & Pierre Clavelou, 2017. "Decreased prevalence of cancer in patients with multiple sclerosis: A case-control study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-11, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0188120
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0188120
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0188120&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0188120?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0188120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.