IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0188038.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk factors for incidental durotomy during posterior open spine surgery for degenerative diseases in adults: A multicenter observational study

Author

Listed:
  • Hisatoshi Ishikura
  • Satoshi Ogihara
  • Hiroyuki Oka
  • Toru Maruyama
  • Hirohiko Inanami
  • Kota Miyoshi
  • Ko Matsudaira
  • Hirotaka Chikuda
  • Seiichi Azuma
  • Naohiro Kawamura
  • Kiyofumi Yamakawa
  • Nobuhiro Hara
  • Yasushi Oshima
  • Jiro Morii
  • Kazuo Saita
  • Sakae Tanaka
  • Takashi Yamazaki

Abstract

Incidental durotomy (ID) is a common intraoperative complication of spine surgery. It can lead to persistent cerebrospinal fluid leakage, which may cause serious complications, including severe headache, pseudomeningocele formation, nerve root entrapment, and intracranial hemorrhage. As a result, it contributes to higher healthcare costs and poor patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to clarify the independent risk factors that can cause ID during posterior open spine surgery for degenerative diseases in adults. We conducted a prospective multicenter study of adult patients who underwent posterior open spine surgery for degenerative diseases at 10 participating hospitals from July 2010 to June 2013. A total of 4,652 consecutive patients were enrolled. We evaluated potential risk factors, including age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, the presence of diabetes mellitus, the use of hemodialysis, smoking status, steroid intake, location of the surgery, type of operative procedure, and past surgical history in the operated area. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors associated with ID. The incidence of ID was 8.2% (380/4,652). Corrective vertebral osteotomy and revision surgery were identified as independent risk factors for ID, while cervical surgery and discectomy were identified as factors that independently protected against ID during posterior open spine surgery for degenerative diseases in adults. Therefore, we identified 2 independent risk factors for and 2 protective factors against ID. These results may contribute to making surgeons aware of the risk factors for ID and can be used to counsel patients on the risks and complications associated with open spine surgery.

Suggested Citation

  • Hisatoshi Ishikura & Satoshi Ogihara & Hiroyuki Oka & Toru Maruyama & Hirohiko Inanami & Kota Miyoshi & Ko Matsudaira & Hirotaka Chikuda & Seiichi Azuma & Naohiro Kawamura & Kiyofumi Yamakawa & Nobuhi, 2017. "Risk factors for incidental durotomy during posterior open spine surgery for degenerative diseases in adults: A multicenter observational study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-8, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0188038
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0188038
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0188038&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0188038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0188038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.