IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0186180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficacy of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors in management of cystoid macular edema in retinitis pigmentosa: A meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Qinzhu Huang
  • Ru Chen
  • Xianping Lin
  • Zhenyang Xiang

Abstract

Background: Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAI) are often used in the treatment of cystoid macular edema (CME) in retinitis pigmentosa (RP) patients. The aim of this meta-analysis is to gain a better understanding of the overall efficacy of CAI treatment. Methods: Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify relevant studies. Eligible studies were clinical trials of patients with RP assigned topical or oral CAIs such as dorzolamide and acetazolamide. Changes in central macular thickness (CMT) by OCT in μm and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in log MAR equivalents were extracted and results compared between baseline and after treatment. Results: 11 clinical reports were identified which included a total of 194 patients (358 eyes) available for analysis, with 59 patients (115 eyes) assigned oral CAI treatment and 135 patients (243 eyes) assigned topical CAI treatment. The combined results showed a significant reduction of macular edema, as calculated by baseline and final central macular thickness (CMT) based on OCT examination (46.02μm, 95%CI: -60.96, -31.08, I2 = 65%). However, the effect on visual acuity was inconsistent across studies. Conclusion: Based on non randomized controlled clinical studies, RP patients with CME who were treated with CAIs had better anatomical outcomes, but the effect on visual acuity was contradictory across studies. Multicenter prospective randomized controlled trials would be ideal to definitively test its clinical efficacy in RP patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Qinzhu Huang & Ru Chen & Xianping Lin & Zhenyang Xiang, 2017. "Efficacy of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors in management of cystoid macular edema in retinitis pigmentosa: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-10, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0186180
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0186180
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0186180&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0186180?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0186180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.