IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0185753.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prospective, multicenter French study evaluating the clinical impact of the Breast Cancer Intrinsic Subtype-Prosigna® Test in the management of early-stage breast cancers

Author

Listed:
  • Delphine Hequet
  • Céline Callens
  • David Gentien
  • Benoit Albaud
  • Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier
  • Coraline Dubot
  • Paul Cottu
  • Cyrille Huchon
  • Sonia Zilberman
  • Helene Berseneff
  • Cyril Foa
  • Rémy Salmon
  • Aurélie Roulot
  • Florence Lerebours
  • Anne Salomon
  • Nadeem Ghali
  • Pascale Morel
  • Qianyi Li
  • Anne Cayre
  • Jean-Marc Guinebretière
  • John Hornberger
  • Frédérique Penault-Llorca
  • Roman Rouzier

Abstract

Purpose: The Prosigna® breast cancer prognostic gene signature assay identifies a gene-expression profile that permits the classification of tumors into subtypes and gives a score for the risk of recurrence (ROR) at 10 years. The primary objective of this multicenter study was to evaluate the impact of Prosigna’s assay information on physicians’ adjuvant treatment decisions in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Secondary objectives were to assess confidence of practitioners in their therapeutic recommendations before and after the added information provided by the Prosigna assay; and to evaluate the emotional state of patients before and after the Prosigna test results. Methods: Consecutive patients with invasive early-stage breast cancer were enrolled in a prospective, observational, multicenter study carried out in 8 hospitals in France. The Prosigna test was carried out on surgical specimens using the nCounter® Analysis System located at the Institut Curie. Both before and after receiving the Prosigna test results, physicians completed treatment confidence questionnaires and patients completed questionnaires concerning their state of anxiety, the difficulties felt in face of the therapy and quality of life. Information was also collected at 6 months regarding the physicians’ opinion on the test results and the patients’ degree of anxiety, difficulties with therapy and quality of life. Results: Between March 2015 and January 2016, 8 study centers in France consecutively enrolled 210 postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER) positive, human epidermal growth hormone-2 (HER-2) negative, and node negative tumors, either stage 1 or stage 2. Intrinsic tumor subtypes as assessed by the Prosigna test were 114 (58.2%) Luminal A, 79 (40.3%) Luminal B, 1 (0.5%) HER-2 enriched (HER-2E), and 2 (1.0%) basal-like. Before receiving the Prosigna test results, physicians categorized tumor subtypes based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) as Luminal A in 126 (64%) patients and Luminal B in 70 (36%) patients, an overall discordance rate of 25%. The availability of Prosigna assay results was significantly associated with the likelihood of change in treatment recommendations, with 34 patients (18%) having their treatment plan changed from Adjuvant Chemotherapy to No Adjuvant Chemotherapy or vice versa (p

Suggested Citation

  • Delphine Hequet & Céline Callens & David Gentien & Benoit Albaud & Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier & Coraline Dubot & Paul Cottu & Cyrille Huchon & Sonia Zilberman & Helene Berseneff & Cyril Foa & Rémy Salm, 2017. "Prospective, multicenter French study evaluating the clinical impact of the Breast Cancer Intrinsic Subtype-Prosigna® Test in the management of early-stage breast cancers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0185753
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185753
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0185753
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0185753&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0185753?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0185753. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.