IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0184025.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Time to publication of oncology trials and why some trials are never published

Author

Listed:
  • Paul B Chapman
  • Nathan J Liu
  • Qin Zhou
  • Alexia Iasonos
  • Sara Hanley
  • George J Bosl
  • David R Spriggs

Abstract

Background: Very little is known about the proportion of oncology trials that get published, the time it takes to publish them, or the reasons why oncology trials do not get published. Methods: We analyzed all clinical trials that closed to accrual at our cancer center between 2009–2013. Trials were categorized by study purpose (therapeutic vs. diagnostic), phase (pilot, phase I, II, or III), and sponsor (industrial, cooperative group, institutional, or peer-reviewed). Final publications were identified in MEDLINE and EMBASE by NCT numbers, or by querying the principal investigator. For trials not published, we surveyed the principal investigators to identify the reason for non-publication. Findings: 469 of 809 protocols (58%) had been published by November 2016. The calculated probability of publication 7 years after completing accrual was 70.4%; the calculated median time to publication was 47 months. Only 18.8% of protocols overall were estimated to be published within 2 years from completing accrual. The calculated probability of publication was higher for therapeutic trials than non-therapeutic trials, but there was no difference based on phase or sponsor. Among protocols not published, 45.3% had completed accrual, and among these, a majority had a manuscript in preparation or review, or the trial was still collecting data. Failure to publish due to a pharmaceutical sponsor was rare. 30.6% of unpublished trials had closed for various reasons before completing accrual, usually due to poor accrual or pharmaceutical sponsor issues. Interpretation: Almost 30% of trials were calculated to be unpublished by 7 years after closing to accrual at our institution. Failure to reach accrual goals was an important factor in non-publication. We have devised new institutional policies that identify trials likely not to meet accrual goals and require early closure. We should be able to shorten the time from accrual completion to publication, especially for pilot and phase I trials for which long follow up is not needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul B Chapman & Nathan J Liu & Qin Zhou & Alexia Iasonos & Sara Hanley & George J Bosl & David R Spriggs, 2017. "Time to publication of oncology trials and why some trials are never published," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-13, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0184025
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0184025
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0184025&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0184025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0184025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.