IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0180072.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Associations between quality of life and duration and frequency of physical activity and sedentary behaviour: Baseline findings from the WALK 2.0 randomised controlled trial

Author

Listed:
  • Gregory S Kolt
  • Emma S George
  • Amanda L Rebar
  • Mitch J Duncan
  • Corneel Vandelanotte
  • Cristina M Caperchione
  • Anthony J Maeder
  • Rhys Tague
  • Trevor N Savage
  • Anetta Van Itallie
  • Nadeesha R Mawella
  • Wei-Wen Hsu
  • W Kerry Mummery
  • Richard R Rosenkranz

Abstract

While physical and mental health benefits of regular physical activity are well known, increasing evidence suggests that limiting sedentary behaviour is also important for health. Evidence shows associations of physical activity and sedentary behaviour with health-related quality of life (HRQoL), however, these findings are based predominantly on duration measures of physical activity and sedentary behaviour (e.g., minutes/week), with less attention on frequency measures (e.g., number of bouts). We examined the association of HRQoL with physical activity and sedentary behaviour, using both continuous duration (average daily minutes) and frequency (average daily bouts≥10 min) measures. Baseline data from the WALK 2.0 trial were analysed. WALK 2.0 is a randomised controlled trial investigating the effects of Web 2.0 applications on engagement, retention, and subsequent physical activity change. Daily physical activity and sedentary behaviour (duration = average minutes, frequency = average number of bouts ≥10 minutes) were measured (ActiGraph GT3X) across one week, and HRQoL was assessed with the ‘general health’ subscale of the RAND 36-Item Health Survey. Structural equation modelling was used to evaluate associations. Participants (N = 504) were 50.8±13.1 (mean±SD) years old with a BMI of 29.3±6.0. The 465 participants with valid accelerometer data engaged in an average of 24.0±18.3 minutes and 0.64±0.74 bouts of moderate-vigorous physical activity per day, 535.2±83.8 minutes and 17.0±3.4 bouts of sedentary behaviour per day, and reported moderate-high general HRQoL (64.5±20.0). After adjusting for covariates, the duration measures of physical activity (path correlation = 0.294, p

Suggested Citation

  • Gregory S Kolt & Emma S George & Amanda L Rebar & Mitch J Duncan & Corneel Vandelanotte & Cristina M Caperchione & Anthony J Maeder & Rhys Tague & Trevor N Savage & Anetta Van Itallie & Nadeesha R Maw, 2017. "Associations between quality of life and duration and frequency of physical activity and sedentary behaviour: Baseline findings from the WALK 2.0 randomised controlled trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0180072
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0180072
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0180072&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0180072?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Puciato & Michał Rozpara & Zbigniew Borysiuk, 2018. "Physical Activity as a Determinant of Quality of Life in Working-Age People in Wrocław, Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Liane Günther & Sarah Schleberger & Claudia R. Pischke, 2021. "Effectiveness of Social Media-Based Interventions for the Promotion of Physical Activity: Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0180072. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.