IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0178944.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of the 3D slicer chest imaging platform segmentation algorithm for large lung nodule delineation

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen S F Yip
  • Chintan Parmar
  • Daniel Blezek
  • Raul San Jose Estepar
  • Steve Pieper
  • John Kim
  • Hugo J W L Aerts

Abstract

Purpose: Accurate segmentation of lung nodules is crucial in the development of imaging biomarkers for predicting malignancy of the nodules. Manual segmentation is time consuming and affected by inter-observer variability. We evaluated the robustness and accuracy of a publically available semiautomatic segmentation algorithm that is implemented in the 3D Slicer Chest Imaging Platform (CIP) and compared it with the performance of manual segmentation. Methods: CT images of 354 manually segmented nodules were downloaded from the LIDC database. Four radiologists performed the manual segmentation and assessed various nodule characteristics. The semiautomatic CIP segmentation was initialized using the centroid of the manual segmentations, thereby generating four contours for each nodule. The robustness of both segmentation methods was assessed using the region of uncertainty (δ) and Dice similarity index (DSI). The robustness of the segmentation methods was compared using the Wilcoxon-signed rank test (pWilcoxon

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen S F Yip & Chintan Parmar & Daniel Blezek & Raul San Jose Estepar & Steve Pieper & John Kim & Hugo J W L Aerts, 2017. "Application of the 3D slicer chest imaging platform segmentation algorithm for large lung nodule delineation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0178944
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178944
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0178944
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0178944&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0178944?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0178944. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.