IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0176464.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Priority target conditions for algorithms for monitoring children's growth: Interdisciplinary consensus

Author

Listed:
  • Pauline Scherdel
  • Rachel Reynaud
  • Christine Pietrement
  • Jean-François Salaün
  • Marc Bellaïche
  • Michel Arnould
  • Bertrand Chevallier
  • Hugues Piloquet
  • Emmanuel Jobez
  • Jacques Cheymol
  • Emmanuelle Bichara
  • the EBGM III study group
  • Barbara Heude
  • Martin Chalumeau

Abstract

Background: Growth monitoring of apparently healthy children aims at early detection of serious conditions through the use of both clinical expertise and algorithms that define abnormal growth. Optimization of growth monitoring requires standardization of the definition of abnormal growth, and the selection of the priority target conditions is a prerequisite of such standardization. Objective: To obtain a consensus about the priority target conditions for algorithms monitoring children's growth. Methods: We applied a formal consensus method with a modified version of the RAND/UCLA method, based on three phases (preparatory, literature review, and rating), with the participation of expert advisory groups from the relevant professional medical societies (ranging from primary care providers to hospital subspecialists) as well as parent associations. We asked experts in the pilot (n = 11), reading (n = 8) and rating (n = 60) groups to complete the list of diagnostic classification of the European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology and then to select the conditions meeting the four predefined criteria of an ideal type of priority target condition. Results: Strong agreement was obtained for the 8 conditions selected by the experts among the 133 possible: celiac disease, Crohn disease, craniopharyngioma, juvenile nephronophthisis, Turner syndrome, growth hormone deficiency with pituitary stalk interruption syndrome, infantile cystinosis, and hypothalamic-optochiasmatic astrocytoma (in decreasing order of agreement). Conclusion: This national consensus can be used to evaluate the algorithms currently suggested for growth monitoring. The method used for this national consensus could be re-used to obtain an international consensus.

Suggested Citation

  • Pauline Scherdel & Rachel Reynaud & Christine Pietrement & Jean-François Salaün & Marc Bellaïche & Michel Arnould & Bertrand Chevallier & Hugues Piloquet & Emmanuel Jobez & Jacques Cheymol & Emmanuell, 2017. "Priority target conditions for algorithms for monitoring children's growth: Interdisciplinary consensus," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-11, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0176464
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176464
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0176464
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0176464&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0176464?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0176464. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.