IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0173519.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prevalence and association of refractive anisometropia with near work habits among young schoolchildren: The evidence from a population-based study

Author

Listed:
  • Chia-Wei Lee
  • Shao-You Fang
  • Der-Chong Tsai
  • Nicole Huang
  • Chih-Chien Hsu
  • Shing-Yi Chen
  • Allen Wen-Hsiang Chiu
  • Catherine Jui-Ling Liu

Abstract

Background: Lifestyle behaviour may play a role in refractive error among children, but the association between near work habits and refractive anisometropia remains unclear. Methods: We estimated the prevalence of refractive anisometropia and examined its association with near work activities among 23,114 children in the Myopia Investigation Study in Taipei who were grade 2 elementary school students at baseline in 2013 and 2014. Baseline data on demographics, medical history, parental history and near work habits were collected by parent-administered questionnaire survey. Refractive status was determined by cycloplegic autorefraction. Refractive anisometropia was defined as the spherical equivalent difference ≥ 1.0 diopter between eyes. Results: The prevalence of refractive anisometropia was 5.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.0% to 5.6%). The prevalence and severity of refractive anisometropia increased with both myopic and hyperopic refractive error. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that refractive anisometropia was significantly associated with myopia (odds ratio [OR], 2.98; 95% CI, 2.53–3.51), hyperopia (OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.98–2.83), degree of astigmatism (OR, 1.005; 95% CI, 1.005–1.006), amblyopia (OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 2.06–3.12), male gender (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78–0.99) and senior high school level of maternal education (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52–0.92). Though anisometropic children were more likely to spend more time on near work (crude OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.02–1.29) and to have less eye-to-object distance in doing near work (crude OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.01–1.30), these associations became insignificant after additional adjustment for ocular, demographic and parental factors. Conclusions: The present study provides large-scale, population-based evidence showing no independent association between refractive anisometropia and near work habits, though myopia is associated with refractive anisometropia.

Suggested Citation

  • Chia-Wei Lee & Shao-You Fang & Der-Chong Tsai & Nicole Huang & Chih-Chien Hsu & Shing-Yi Chen & Allen Wen-Hsiang Chiu & Catherine Jui-Ling Liu, 2017. "Prevalence and association of refractive anisometropia with near work habits among young schoolchildren: The evidence from a population-based study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0173519
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0173519
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0173519&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0173519?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hsiu-Mei Huang & Dolly Shuo-Teh Chang & Pei-Chang Wu, 2015. "The Association between Near Work Activities and Myopia in Children—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Frédéric Dutheil & Tharwa Oueslati & Louis Delamarre & Joris Castanon & Caroline Maurin & Frédéric Chiambaretta & Julien S. Baker & Ukadike C. Ugbolue & Marek Zak & Ines Lakbar & Bruno Pereira & Valen, 2023. "Myopia and Near Work: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-22, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Baeza Moyano & Roberto Alonso González-Lezcano, 2021. "Pandemic of Childhood Myopia. Could New Indoor LED Lighting Be Part of the Solution?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Chi-wai Do & Lily Y. L. Chan & Andy C. Y. Tse & Teris Cheung & Billy C. L. So & Wing Chun Tang & W. Y. Yu & Geoffrey C. H. Chu & Grace P. Y. Szeto & Regina L. T. Lee & Paul H. Lee, 2020. "Association between Time Spent on Smart Devices and Change in Refractive Error: A 1-Year Prospective Observational Study among Hong Kong Children and Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-11, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0173519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.