IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0145250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Social Networks in Patients with Psychotic Disorders: A Systematic Review of Instruments

Author

Listed:
  • Joyce Siette
  • Claudia Gulea
  • Stefan Priebe

Abstract

Background: Evidence suggests that social networks of patients with psychotic disorders influence symptoms, quality of life and treatment outcomes. It is therefore important to assess social networks for which appropriate and preferably established instruments should be used. Aims: To identify instruments assessing social networks in studies of patients with psychotic disorders and explore their properties. Method: A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted to identify studies that used a measure of social networks in patients with psychotic disorders. Results: Eight instruments were identified, all of which had been developed before 1991. They have been used in 65 studies (total N of patients = 8,522). They assess one or more aspects of social networks such as their size, structure, dimensionality and quality. Most instruments have various shortcomings, including questionable inter-rater and test-retest reliability. Conclusions: The assessment of social networks in patients with psychotic disorders is characterized by a variety of approaches which may reflect the complexity of the construct. Further research on social networks in patients with psychotic disorders would benefit from advanced and more precise instruments using comparable definitions of and timescales for social networks across studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Joyce Siette & Claudia Gulea & Stefan Priebe, 2015. "Assessing Social Networks in Patients with Psychotic Disorders: A Systematic Review of Instruments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0145250
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0145250
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0145250&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0145250?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0145250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.