IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0135907.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

FFCD-1004 Clinical Trial: Impact of Cytidine Deaminase Activity on Clinical Outcome in Gemcitabine-Monotherapy Treated Patients

Author

Listed:
  • Cindy Serdjebi
  • Johan Gagnière
  • Jérôme Desramé
  • Francine Fein
  • Rosine Guimbaud
  • Eric François
  • Thierry André
  • Jean-François Seitz
  • Carole Montérymard
  • Dominique Arsene
  • Julien Volet
  • Abakar Abakar-Mahamat
  • Thierry Lecomte
  • Véronique Guerin-Meyer
  • Jean-Louis Legoux
  • Gaël Deplanque
  • Pierre Guillet
  • Joseph Ciccolini
  • Côme Lepage
  • Laetitia Dahan

Abstract

Purpose: Because cytidine deaminase (CDA) is the key enzyme in gemcitabine metabolism, numerous studies have attempted to investigate impact of CDA status (i.e. genotype or phenotype) on clinical outcome. To date, data are still controversial because none of these studies has fully investigated genotype-phenotype CDA status, pharmacokinetics and clinical outcome relationships in gemcitabine-treated patients. Besides, most patients were treated with gemcitabine associated with other drugs, thus adding a confounding factor. We performed a multicenter prospective clinical trial in gemcitabine-treated patients which aimed at investigating the link between CDA deficiency on the occurrence of severe toxicities and on pharmacokinetics, and studying CDA genotype-phenotype relationships. Experimental design: One hundred twenty patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma eligible for adjuvant gemcitabine monotherapy were enrolled in this study promoted and managed by the Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive. Toxicities were graded according to National Cancer Institute’s Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4. They were considered severe for grade ≥ 3, and early when occurring during the first eight weeks of treatment. CDA status was evaluated using a double approach: genotyping for 79A>C and functional testing. Therapeutic drug monitoring of gemcitabine and its metabolite were performed on the first course of gemcitabine. Results: Five patients out of 120 (i.e., 4.6%) were found to be CDA deficient (i.e., CDA activity

Suggested Citation

  • Cindy Serdjebi & Johan Gagnière & Jérôme Desramé & Francine Fein & Rosine Guimbaud & Eric François & Thierry André & Jean-François Seitz & Carole Montérymard & Dominique Arsene & Julien Volet & Abakar, 2015. "FFCD-1004 Clinical Trial: Impact of Cytidine Deaminase Activity on Clinical Outcome in Gemcitabine-Monotherapy Treated Patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-12, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0135907
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135907
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0135907
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0135907&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0135907?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0135907. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.