IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0126974.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Attention on Judgments of Frequency and Duration

Author

Listed:
  • Isabell Winkler
  • Madlen Glauer
  • Tilmann Betsch
  • Peter Sedlmeier

Abstract

Previous studies that examined human judgments of frequency and duration found an asymmetrical relationship: While frequency judgments were quite accurate and independent of stimulus duration, duration judgments were highly dependent upon stimulus frequency. A potential explanation for these findings is that the asymmetry is moderated by the amount of attention directed to the stimuli. In the current experiment, participants' attention was manipulated in two ways: (a) intrinsically, by varying the type and arousal potential of the stimuli (names, low-arousal and high-arousal pictures), and (b) extrinsically, by varying the physical effort participants expended during the stimulus presentation (by lifting a dumbbell vs. relaxing the arm). Participants processed stimuli with varying presentation frequencies and durations and were subsequently asked to estimate the frequency and duration of each stimulus. Sensitivity to duration increased for pictures in general, especially when processed under physical effort. A large effect of stimulus frequency on duration judgments was obtained for all experimental conditions, but a similar large effect of presentation duration on frequency judgments emerged only in the conditions that could be expected to draw high amounts of attention to the stimuli: when pictures were judged under high physical effort. Almost no difference in the mutual impact of frequency and duration was obtained for low-arousal or high-arousal pictures. The mechanisms underlying the simultaneous processing of frequency and duration are discussed with respect to existing models derived from animal research. Options for the extension of such models to human processing of frequency and duration are suggested.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabell Winkler & Madlen Glauer & Tilmann Betsch & Peter Sedlmeier, 2015. "The Impact of Attention on Judgments of Frequency and Duration," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0126974
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126974
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0126974
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0126974&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0126974?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amir Homayoun Javadi & Clarisse Aichelburg, 2012. "When Time and Numerosity Interfere: The Longer the More, and the More the Longer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(7), pages 1-9, July.
    2. repec:cup:judgdm:v:5:y:2010:i:5:p:347-364 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Carmelo Mario Vicario & Patrizia Pecoraro & Patrizia Turriziani & Giacomo Koch & Carlo Caltagirone & Massimiliano Oliveri, 2008. "Relativistic Compression and Expansion of Experiential Time in the Left and Right Space," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(3), pages 1-4, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:cup:judgdm:v:16:y:2021:i:2:p:460-483 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Johannes Titz & Peter Sedlmeier, 2021. "Judgments of frequency and duration: One or two Underlying Dimensions?," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 16(2), pages 460-483, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Lambrechts & Vincent Walsh & Virginie van Wassenhove, 2013. "Evidence Accumulation in the Magnitude System," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Amir Homayoun Javadi & Clarisse Aichelburg, 2013. "Training Enhances the Interference of Numerosity on Duration Judgement," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-8, January.
    3. Qingxia Ma & Zhen Yang & Zhijie Zhang, 2012. "The Modulation of Implicit Magnitude on Time Estimates," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-6, October.
    4. Zhenguang G Cai & Ruiming Wang, 2014. "Numerical Magnitude Affects Temporal Memories but Not Time Encoding," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-9, January.
    5. Carmelo Mario Vicario & Giulia Sgubin & Anica Newman, 2014. "Random Movements Generation in Western and Eastern Cultures," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(3), pages 21582440145, September.
    6. Nadine Schlichting & Ritske de Jong & Hedderik van Rijn, 2018. "Robustness of individual differences in temporal interference effects," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, August.
    7. Kevin J Holmes & Stella F Lourenco, 2013. "When Numbers Get Heavy: Is the Mental Number Line Exclusively Numerical?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-5, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0126974. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.