IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0124388.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Language Differences in the Brain Network for Reading in Naturalistic Story Reading and Lexical Decision

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaojuan Wang
  • Jianfeng Yang
  • Jie Yang
  • W Einar Mencl
  • Hua Shu
  • Jason David Zevin

Abstract

Differences in how writing systems represent language raise important questions about whether there could be a universal functional architecture for reading across languages. In order to study potential language differences in the neural networks that support reading skill, we collected fMRI data from readers of alphabetic (English) and morpho-syllabic (Chinese) writing systems during two reading tasks. In one, participants read short stories under conditions that approximate natural reading, and in the other, participants decided whether individual stimuli were real words or not. Prior work comparing these two writing systems has overwhelmingly used meta-linguistic tasks, generally supporting the conclusion that the reading system is organized differently for skilled readers of Chinese and English. We observed that language differences in the reading network were greatly dependent on task. In lexical decision, a pattern consistent with prior research was observed in which the Middle Frontal Gyrus (MFG) and right Fusiform Gyrus (rFFG) were more active for Chinese than for English, whereas the posterior temporal sulcus was more active for English than for Chinese. We found a very different pattern of language effects in a naturalistic reading paradigm, during which significant differences were only observed in visual regions not typically considered specific to the reading network, and the middle temporal gyrus, which is thought to be important for direct mapping of orthography to semantics. Indeed, in areas that are often discussed as supporting distinct cognitive or linguistic functions between the two languages, we observed interaction. Specifically, language differences were most pronounced in MFG and rFFG during the lexical decision task, whereas no language differences were observed in these areas during silent reading of text for comprehension.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaojuan Wang & Jianfeng Yang & Jie Yang & W Einar Mencl & Hua Shu & Jason David Zevin, 2015. "Language Differences in the Brain Network for Reading in Naturalistic Story Reading and Lexical Decision," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-25, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0124388
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124388
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0124388
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0124388&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0124388?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wai Ting Siok & Charles A. Perfetti & Zhen Jin & Li Hai Tan, 2004. "Biological abnormality of impaired reading is constrained by culture," Nature, Nature, vol. 431(7004), pages 71-76, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fan Cao & Charles A Perfetti, 2016. "Neural Signatures of the Reading-Writing Connection: Greater Involvement of Writing in Chinese Reading than English Reading," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23, December.
    2. Yuhang Lin & Xuanzhi Zhang & Qingjun Huang & Laiwen Lv & Anyan Huang & Ai Li & Kusheng Wu & Yanhong Huang, 2020. "The Prevalence of Dyslexia in Primary School Children and Their Chinese Literacy Assessment in Shantou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-12, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0124388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.