IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0117027.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Evolution of Different Forms of Sociality: Behavioral Mechanisms and Eco-Evolutionary Feedback

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel J van der Post
  • Rineke Verbrugge
  • Charlotte K Hemelrijk

Abstract

Different forms of sociality have evolved via unique evolutionary trajectories. However, it remains unknown to what extent trajectories of social evolution depend on the specific characteristics of different species. Our approach to studying such trajectories is to use evolutionary case-studies, so that we can investigate how grouping co-evolves with a multitude of individual characteristics. Here we focus on anti-predator vigilance and foraging. We use an individual-based model, where behavioral mechanisms are specified, and costs and benefits are not predefined. We show that evolutionary changes in grouping alter selection pressures on vigilance, and vice versa. This eco-evolutionary feedback generates an evolutionary progression from “leader-follower” societies to “fission-fusion” societies, where cooperative vigilance in groups is maintained via a balance between within- and between-group selection. Group-level selection is generated from an assortment that arises spontaneously when vigilant and non-vigilant foragers have different grouping tendencies. The evolutionary maintenance of small groups, and cooperative vigilance in those groups, is therefore achieved simultaneously. The evolutionary phases, and the transitions between them, depend strongly on behavioral mechanisms. Thus, integrating behavioral mechanisms and eco-evolutionary feedback is critical for understanding what kinds of intermediate stages are involved during the evolution of particular forms of sociality.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel J van der Post & Rineke Verbrugge & Charlotte K Hemelrijk, 2015. "The Evolution of Different Forms of Sociality: Behavioral Mechanisms and Eco-Evolutionary Feedback," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0117027
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0117027
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0117027&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0117027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. van Weerden, J. Fransje & Verbrugge, Rineke & Hemelrijk, Charlotte K., 2020. "Modelling non-attentional visual information transmission in groups under predation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 431(C).
    2. Eliassen, Sigrunn & Andersen, Bjørn Snorre & Jørgensen, Christian & Giske, Jarl, 2016. "From sensing to emergent adaptations: Modelling the proximate architecture for decision-making," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 90-100.
    3. Pascal P Klamser & Pawel Romanczuk, 2021. "Collective predator evasion: Putting the criticality hypothesis to the test," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-21, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0117027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.