IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0115304.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Inter Subject Variability and Reproducibility of Whole Brain Proton Spectroscopy

Author

Listed:
  • Tonny V Veenith
  • Marius Mada
  • Eleanor Carter
  • Julia Grossac
  • Virginia Newcombe
  • Joanne Outtrim
  • Victoria Lupson
  • Sridhar Nallapareddy
  • Guy B Williams
  • Sulaiman Sheriff
  • David K Menon
  • Andrew A Maudsley
  • Jonathan P Coles

Abstract

The aim of these studies was to provide reference data on intersubject variability and reproducibility of metabolite ratios for Choline/Creatine (Cho/Cr), N-acetyl aspartate/Choline (NAA/Cho) and N-acetyl aspartate/Creatine (NAA/Cr), and individual signal-intensity normalised metabolite concentrations of NAA, Cho and Cr. Healthy volunteers underwent imaging on two occasions using the same 3T Siemens Verio magnetic resonance scanner. At each session two identical Metabolic Imaging and Data Acquisition Software (MIDAS) sequences were obtained along with standard structural imaging. Metabolite maps were created and regions of interest applied in normalised space. The baseline data from all 32 volunteers were used to calculate the intersubject variability, while within session and between session reproducibility were calculated from all the available data. The reproducibility of measurements were used to calculate the overall and within session 95% prediction interval for zero change. The within and between session reproducibility data were lower than the values for intersubject variability, and were variable across the different brain regions. The within and between session reproducibility measurements were similar for Cho/Cr, NAA/Choline, Cho and Cr (11.8%, 11.4%, 14.3 and 10.6% vs. 11.9%, 11.4%, 13.5% and 10.5% respectively), but for NAA/Creatine and NAA between session reproducibility was lower (9.3% and 9.1% vs. 10.1% and 9.9%; p

Suggested Citation

  • Tonny V Veenith & Marius Mada & Eleanor Carter & Julia Grossac & Virginia Newcombe & Joanne Outtrim & Victoria Lupson & Sridhar Nallapareddy & Guy B Williams & Sulaiman Sheriff & David K Menon & Andre, 2014. "Comparison of Inter Subject Variability and Reproducibility of Whole Brain Proton Spectroscopy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-23, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0115304
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0115304
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0115304&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0115304?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0115304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.