IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0111692.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

PDE5 Inhibition Improves Object Memory in Standard Housed Rats but Not in Rats Housed in an Enriched Environment: Implications for Memory Models?

Author

Listed:
  • Sven Akkerman
  • Jos Prickaerts
  • Ann K Bruder
  • Kevin H M Wolfs
  • Jochen De Vry
  • Tim Vanmierlo
  • Arjan Blokland

Abstract

Drug effects are usually evaluated in animals housed under maximally standardized conditions. However, it is assumed that an enriched environment (EE) more closely resembles human conditions as compared to maximally standardized laboratory conditions. In the present study, we examined the acute cognition enhancing effects of vardenafil, a PDE5 inhibitor, which stimulates protein kinase G/CREB signaling in cells, in three different groups of male Wistar rats tested in an object recognition task (ORT). Rats were either housed solitarily (SOL) or socially (SOC) under standard conditions, or socially in an EE. Although EE animals remembered object information longer in the vehicle condition, vardenafil only improved object memory in SOL and SOC animals. While EE animals had a heavier dorsal hippocampus, we found no differences between experimental groups in total cell numbers in the dentate gyrus, CA2–3 or CA1. Neither were there any differences in markers for pre- and postsynaptic density. No changes in PDE5 mRNA- and protein expression levels were observed. Basal pCREB levels were increased in EE rats only, whereas β-catenin was not affected, suggesting specific activation of the MAP kinase signaling pathway and not the AKT pathway. A possible explanation for the inefficacy of vardenafil could be that CREB signaling is already optimally stimulated in the hippocampus of EE rats. Since previous data has shown that acute PDE5 inhibition does not improve memory performance in humans, the use of EE animals could be considered as a more valid model for testing cognition enhancing drugs.

Suggested Citation

  • Sven Akkerman & Jos Prickaerts & Ann K Bruder & Kevin H M Wolfs & Jochen De Vry & Tim Vanmierlo & Arjan Blokland, 2014. "PDE5 Inhibition Improves Object Memory in Standard Housed Rats but Not in Rats Housed in an Enriched Environment: Implications for Memory Models?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-11, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0111692
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111692
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111692&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0111692?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerd Kempermann & H. Georg Kuhn & Fred H. Gage, 1997. "More hippocampal neurons in adult mice living in an enriched environment," Nature, Nature, vol. 386(6624), pages 493-495, April.
    2. David P. Wolfer & Oxana Litvin & Samuel Morf & Roger M. Nitsch & Hans-Peter Lipp & Hanno Würbel, 2004. "Cage enrichment and mouse behaviour," Nature, Nature, vol. 432(7019), pages 821-822, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wen-Chung Liu & Chih-Wei Wu & Pi-Lien Hung & Julie Y. H. Chan & You-Lin Tain & Mu-Hui Fu & Lee-Wei Chen & Chih-Kuang Liang & Chun-Ying Hung & Hong-Ren Yu & I-Chun Chen & Kay L.H. Wu, 2020. "Environmental Stimulation Counteracts the Suppressive Effects of Maternal High-Fructose Diet on Cell Proliferation and Neuronal Differentiation in the Dentate Gyrus of Adult Female Offspring via Histo," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Woodley of Menie, Michael A. & Peñaherrera-Aguirre, Mateo & Sarraf, Matthew A., 2022. "Signs of a Flynn effect in rodents? Secular differentiation of the manifold of general cognitive ability in laboratory mice (Mus musculus) and Norwegian rats (Rattus norvegicus) over a century—Results," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    3. Jamie L Hanson & Amitabh Chandra & Barbara L Wolfe & Seth D Pollak, 2011. "Association between Income and the Hippocampus," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-8, May.
    4. Manvendra Singh & Ying Zhao & Vinicius Daguano Gastaldi & Sonja M. Wojcik & Yasmina Curto & Riki Kawaguchi & Ricardo M. Merino & Laura Fernandez Garcia-Agudo & Holger Taschenberger & Nils Brose & Dani, 2023. "Erythropoietin re-wires cognition-associated transcriptional networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Jessica L Reed & Enrico D’Ambrosio & Stefano Marenco & Gianluca Ursini & Amanda B Zheutlin & Giuseppe Blasi & Barbara E Spencer & Raffaella Romano & Jesse Hochheiser & Ann Reifman & Justin Sturm & Kar, 2018. "Interaction of childhood urbanicity and variation in dopamine genes alters adult prefrontal function as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Alexandros A. Lavdas & Nikos A. Salingaros, 2021. "Can Suboptimal Visual Environments Negatively Affect Children’s Cognitive Development?," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-12, November.
    7. Alexander Kotrschal & Barbara Taborsky, 2010. "Environmental Change Enhances Cognitive Abilities in Fish," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-7, April.
    8. Kai Diederich & Wolf-Rüdiger Schäbitz & Katharina Kuhnert & Nina Hellström & Norbert Sachser & Armin Schneider & Hans-Georg Kuhn & Stefan Knecht, 2009. "Synergetic Effects of Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor and Cognitive Training on Spatial Learning and Survival of Newborn Hippocampal Neurons," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(4), pages 1-7, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0111692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.