IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0107105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantification of the Heterogeneity of Prognostic Cellular Biomarkers in Ewing Sarcoma Using Automated Image and Random Survival Forest Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Claudia Bühnemann
  • Simon Li
  • Haiyue Yu
  • Harriet Branford White
  • Karl L Schäfer
  • Antonio Llombart-Bosch
  • Isidro Machado
  • Piero Picci
  • Pancras C W Hogendoorn
  • Nicholas A Athanasou
  • J Alison Noble
  • A Bassim Hassan

Abstract

Driven by genomic somatic variation, tumour tissues are typically heterogeneous, yet unbiased quantitative methods are rarely used to analyse heterogeneity at the protein level. Motivated by this problem, we developed automated image segmentation of images of multiple biomarkers in Ewing sarcoma to generate distributions of biomarkers between and within tumour cells. We further integrate high dimensional data with patient clinical outcomes utilising random survival forest (RSF) machine learning. Using material from cohorts of genetically diagnosed Ewing sarcoma with EWSR1 chromosomal translocations, confocal images of tissue microarrays were segmented with level sets and watershed algorithms. Each cell nucleus and cytoplasm were identified in relation to DAPI and CD99, respectively, and protein biomarkers (e.g. Ki67, pS6, Foxo3a, EGR1, MAPK) localised relative to nuclear and cytoplasmic regions of each cell in order to generate image feature distributions. The image distribution features were analysed with RSF in relation to known overall patient survival from three separate cohorts (185 informative cases). Variation in pre-analytical processing resulted in elimination of a high number of non-informative images that had poor DAPI localisation or biomarker preservation (67 cases, 36%). The distribution of image features for biomarkers in the remaining high quality material (118 cases, 104 features per case) were analysed by RSF with feature selection, and performance assessed using internal cross-validation, rather than a separate validation cohort. A prognostic classifier for Ewing sarcoma with low cross-validation error rates (0.36) was comprised of multiple features, including the Ki67 proliferative marker and a sub-population of cells with low cytoplasmic/nuclear ratio of CD99. Through elimination of bias, the evaluation of high-dimensionality biomarker distribution within cell populations of a tumour using random forest analysis in quality controlled tumour material could be achieved. Such an automated and integrated methodology has potential application in the identification of prognostic classifiers based on tumour cell heterogeneity.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudia Bühnemann & Simon Li & Haiyue Yu & Harriet Branford White & Karl L Schäfer & Antonio Llombart-Bosch & Isidro Machado & Piero Picci & Pancras C W Hogendoorn & Nicholas A Athanasou & J Alison No, 2014. "Quantification of the Heterogeneity of Prognostic Cellular Biomarkers in Ewing Sarcoma Using Automated Image and Random Survival Forest Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-14, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0107105
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0107105
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0107105&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0107105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas Navin & Jude Kendall & Jennifer Troge & Peter Andrews & Linda Rodgers & Jeanne McIndoo & Kerry Cook & Asya Stepansky & Dan Levy & Diane Esposito & Lakshmi Muthuswamy & Alex Krasnitz & W. Rich, 2011. "Tumour evolution inferred by single-cell sequencing," Nature, Nature, vol. 472(7341), pages 90-94, April.
    2. Ishwaran, Hemant & Kogalur, Udaya B., 2010. "Consistency of random survival forests," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(13-14), pages 1056-1064, July.
    3. Jun Kong & Lee A D Cooper & Fusheng Wang & Jingjing Gao & George Teodoro & Lisa Scarpace & Tom Mikkelsen & Matthew J Schniederjan & Carlos S Moreno & Joel H Saltz & Daniel J Brat, 2013. "Machine-Based Morphologic Analysis of Glioblastoma Using Whole-Slide Pathology Images Uncovers Clinically Relevant Molecular Correlates," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-1, November.
    4. Emrys A Jones & Alexandra van Remoortere & René J M van Zeijl & Pancras C W Hogendoorn & Judith V M G Bovée & André M Deelder & Liam A McDonnell, 2011. "Multiple Statistical Analysis Techniques Corroborate Intratumor Heterogeneity in Imaging Mass Spectrometry Datasets of Myxofibrosarcoma," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-14, September.
    5. David B. Seligson & Steve Horvath & Tao Shi & Hong Yu & Sheila Tze & Michael Grunstein & Siavash K. Kurdistani, 2005. "Global histone modification patterns predict risk of prostate cancer recurrence," Nature, Nature, vol. 435(7046), pages 1262-1266, June.
    6. Corbin E. Meacham & Sean J. Morrison, 2013. "Tumour heterogeneity and cancer cell plasticity," Nature, Nature, vol. 501(7467), pages 328-337, September.
    7. Jan Budczies & Frederick Klauschen & Bruno V Sinn & Balázs Győrffy & Wolfgang D Schmitt & Silvia Darb-Esfahani & Carsten Denkert, 2012. "Cutoff Finder: A Comprehensive and Straightforward Web Application Enabling Rapid Biomarker Cutoff Optimization," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-7, December.
    8. Mike Tyers & Matthias Mann, 2003. "From genomics to proteomics," Nature, Nature, vol. 422(6928), pages 193-197, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Remy Elbez & Jeff Folz & Alan McLean & Hernan Roca & Joseph M Labuz & Kenneth J Pienta & Shuichi Takayama & Raoul Kopelman, 2021. "Cell-morphodynamic phenotype classification with application to cancer metastasis using cell magnetorotation and machine-learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Humberto Contreras-Trujillo & Jiya Eerdeng & Samir Akre & Du Jiang & Jorge Contreras & Basia Gala & Mary C. Vergel-Rodriguez & Yeachan Lee & Aparna Jorapur & Areen Andreasian & Lisa Harton & Charles S, 2021. "Deciphering intratumoral heterogeneity using integrated clonal tracking and single-cell transcriptome analyses," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Seong Eun Lee & Seongyeol Park & Shinae Yi & Na Rae Choi & Mi Ae Lim & Jae Won Chang & Ho-Ryun Won & Je Ryong Kim & Hye Mi Ko & Eun-Jae Chung & Young Joo Park & Sun Wook Cho & Hyeong Won Yu & June You, 2024. "Unraveling the role of the mitochondrial one-carbon pathway in undifferentiated thyroid cancer by multi-omics analyses," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Jin Sheng & Yun-Peng Yang & Yu-Xiang Ma & Tao Qin & Zhi-Huang Hu & Shao-Dong Hong & Ting Zhou & Yan Huang & Hong-Yun Zhao & Li Zhang, 2016. "Low Prognostic Nutritional Index Correlates with Worse Survival in Patients with Advanced NSCLC following EGFR-TKIs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, January.
    5. Jiang Tan & Hui-Zhen Fu & Yuh-Shan Ho, 2014. "A bibliometric analysis of research on proteomics in Science Citation Index Expanded," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(2), pages 1473-1490, February.
    6. Haralampos Hatzikirou & Nikos I. Kavallaris & Marta Leocata, 2021. "A Novel Averaging Principle Provides Insights in the Impact of Intratumoral Heterogeneity on Tumor Progression," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(20), pages 1-27, October.
    7. Jinhyun Kim & Sungsik Kim & Huiran Yeom & Seo Woo Song & Kyoungseob Shin & Sangwook Bae & Han Suk Ryu & Ji Young Kim & Ahyoun Choi & Sumin Lee & Taehoon Ryu & Yeongjae Choi & Hamin Kim & Okju Kim & Yu, 2023. "Barcoded multiple displacement amplification for high coverage sequencing in spatial genomics," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Noushin Niknafs & Violeta Beleva-Guthrie & Daniel Q Naiman & Rachel Karchin, 2015. "SubClonal Hierarchy Inference from Somatic Mutations: Automatic Reconstruction of Cancer Evolutionary Trees from Multi-region Next Generation Sequencing," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-26, October.
    9. Albert H Gough & Ning Chen & Tong Ying Shun & Timothy R Lezon & Robert C Boltz & Celeste E Reese & Jacob Wagner & Lawrence A Vernetti & Jennifer R Grandis & Adrian V Lee & Andrew M Stern & Mark E Schu, 2014. "Identifying and Quantifying Heterogeneity in High Content Analysis: Application of Heterogeneity Indices to Drug Discovery," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-16, July.
    10. Yidong Zhou & Changjun Wang & Hanjiang Zhu & Yan Lin & Bo Pan & Xiaohui Zhang & Xin Huang & Qianqian Xu & Yali Xu & Qiang Sun, 2016. "Diagnostic Accuracy of PIK3CA Mutation Detection by Circulating Free DNA in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, June.
    11. Yanying Wang & Jing Wang & Xiaoyu Li & Xushen Xiong & Jianyi Wang & Ziheng Zhou & Xiaoxiao Zhu & Yang Gu & Dan Dominissini & Lei He & Yong Tian & Chengqi Yi & Zusen Fan, 2021. "N1-methyladenosine methylation in tRNA drives liver tumourigenesis by regulating cholesterol metabolism," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    12. Miranda V. Hunter & Reuben Moncada & Joshua M. Weiss & Itai Yanai & Richard M. White, 2021. "Spatially resolved transcriptomics reveals the architecture of the tumor-microenvironment interface," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Susan Athey & Julie Tibshirani & Stefan Wager, 2016. "Generalized Random Forests," Papers 1610.01271, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2018.
    14. B Rey deCastro, 2019. "Cumulative ROC curves for discriminating three or more ordinal outcomes with cutpoints on a shared continuous measurement scale," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, August.
    15. Gérard Biau & Erwan Scornet, 2016. "A random forest guided tour," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(2), pages 197-227, June.
    16. Josefine Radke & Elisa Schumann & Julia Onken & Randi Koll & Güliz Acker & Bohdan Bodnar & Carolin Senger & Sascha Tierling & Markus Möbs & Peter Vajkoczy & Anna Vidal & Sandra Högler & Petra Kodajova, 2022. "Decoding molecular programs in melanoma brain metastases," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, December.
    17. Hyungjin Kim & Chang Min Park & Bhumsuk Keam & Sang Joon Park & Miso Kim & Tae Min Kim & Dong-Wan Kim & Dae Seog Heo & Jin Mo Goo, 2017. "The prognostic value of CT radiomic features for patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-13, November.
    18. Hoora Moradian & Denis Larocque & François Bellavance, 2017. "$$L_1$$ L 1 splitting rules in survival forests," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 671-691, October.
    19. Chunyang Bao & Richard W. Tourdot & Gregory J. Brunette & Chip Stewart & Lili Sun & Hideo Baba & Masayuki Watanabe & Agoston T. Agoston & Kunal Jajoo & Jon M. Davison & Katie S. Nason & Gad Getz & Ken, 2023. "Genomic signatures of past and present chromosomal instability in Barrett’s esophagus and early esophageal adenocarcinoma," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22, December.
    20. Xian F Mallory & Mohammadamin Edrisi & Nicholas Navin & Luay Nakhleh, 2020. "Assessing the performance of methods for copy number aberration detection from single-cell DNA sequencing data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-24, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0107105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.