IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0106765.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Risk Prediction Model for Screening Bacteremic Patients: A Cross Sectional Study

Author

Listed:
  • Franz Ratzinger
  • Michel Dedeyan
  • Matthias Rammerstorfer
  • Thomas Perkmann
  • Heinz Burgmann
  • Athanasios Makristathis
  • Georg Dorffner
  • Felix Lötsch
  • Alexander Blacky
  • Michael Ramharter

Abstract

Background: Bacteraemia is a frequent and severe condition with a high mortality rate. Despite profound knowledge about the pre-test probability of bacteraemia, blood culture analysis often results in low rates of pathogen detection and therefore increasing diagnostic costs. To improve the cost-effectiveness of blood culture sampling, we computed a risk prediction model based on highly standardizable variables, with the ultimate goal to identify via an automated decision support tool patients with very low risk for bacteraemia. Methods: In this retrospective hospital-wide cohort study evaluating 15,985 patients with suspected bacteraemia, 51 variables were assessed for their diagnostic potency. A derivation cohort (n = 14.699) was used for feature and model selection as well as for cut-off specification. Models were established using the A2DE classifier, a supervised Bayesian classifier. Two internally validated models were further evaluated by a validation cohort (n = 1,286). Results: The proportion of neutrophile leukocytes in differential blood count was the best individual variable to predict bacteraemia (ROC-AUC: 0.694). Applying the A2DE classifier, two models, model 1 (20 variables) and model 2 (10 variables) were established with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.767 and 0.759, respectively. In the validation cohort, ROC-AUCs of 0.800 and 0.786 were achieved. Using predefined cut-off points, 16% and 12% of patients were allocated to the low risk group with a negative predictive value of more than 98.8%. Conclusion: Applying the proposed models, more than ten percent of patients with suspected blood stream infection were identified having minimal risk for bacteraemia. Based on these data the application of this model as an automated decision support tool for physicians is conceivable leading to a potential increase in the cost-effectiveness of blood culture sampling. External prospective validation of the model's generalizability is needed for further appreciation of the usefulness of this tool.

Suggested Citation

  • Franz Ratzinger & Michel Dedeyan & Matthias Rammerstorfer & Thomas Perkmann & Heinz Burgmann & Athanasios Makristathis & Georg Dorffner & Felix Lötsch & Alexander Blacky & Michael Ramharter, 2014. "A Risk Prediction Model for Screening Bacteremic Patients: A Cross Sectional Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-10, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0106765
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106765
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0106765
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0106765&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0106765?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beatriz García-Jiménez & David Juan & Iakes Ezkurdia & Eduardo Andrés-León & Alfonso Valencia, 2010. "Inference of Functional Relations in Predicted Protein Networks with a Machine Learning Approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(4), pages 1-10, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0106765. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.