IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0101916.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Meta-Analysis Assessment of GP210 and SP100 for the Diagnosis of Primary Biliary Cirrhosis

Author

Listed:
  • Shi-Ling Hu
  • Feng-Rong Zhao
  • Qin Hu
  • Wei-Xian Chen

Abstract

Purpose: To conduct a systematic review of included studies assessing the association of GP210 and SP100 with the risk of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) using meta-analysis. Methods: Five databases, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, VIP, CNKI, WANFANG were used to detect the role of GP210 and SP100 in diagnosis of PBC. Approximately 13,000 participants from several countries were included in this analysis. Meta-DiSc statistical software was used for analysis. Results: 25 studies on GP210 and 21 studies on SP100 were included in the meta-analysis. The DOR, sensitivity, specificity of GP210 in diagnosis of PBC were 24.854 (11.957–51.660), 0.272 (0.257–0.288), 0.985 (0.982–0.988), respectively, and they were 9.133 (4.739–17.600), 0.231 (0.213–0.249), 0.977 (0.973–0.981) for SP100. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis indicated both GP210 and SP100 had high specificity but low sensitivity in diagnosis of PBC.

Suggested Citation

  • Shi-Ling Hu & Feng-Rong Zhao & Qin Hu & Wei-Xian Chen, 2014. "Meta-Analysis Assessment of GP210 and SP100 for the Diagnosis of Primary Biliary Cirrhosis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-9, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0101916
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0101916
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0101916&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0101916?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0101916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.