IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0096999.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prognostic Value of FDG PET Imaging in Patients with Laryngeal Cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Kazuhiro Kitajima
  • Yuko Suenaga
  • Tomonori Kanda
  • Daisuke Miyawaki
  • Kenji Yoshida
  • Yasuo Ejima
  • Ryohei Sasaki
  • Hirokazu Komatsu
  • Miki Saito
  • Naoki Otsuki
  • Ken-ichi Nibu
  • Naomi Kiyota
  • Tsutomu Minamikawa
  • Kazuro Sugimura

Abstract

Background and Purpose: To investigate the prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in patients with laryngeal cancer. Materials and Methods: The study included 51 patients of whom 30 underwent definitive radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy and 21 underwent radical surgery with or without adjuvant chemoradiation therapy. FDG uptake by both the primary lesion and the neck node was measured using the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). The effects of clinicopathological factors including primary tumor SUVmax and nodal SUVmax on progression-free survival, local control, nodal progression-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival were evaluated using the log-rank test and Cox method. Results: The median duration of follow-up was 48.6 months (range 8 to 82.1 months). Univariate analysis showed that nodal SUVmax, N status, and tumor TNM stage were significantly associated with recurrence, whereas primary tumor SUVmax, age, treatment strategy and T status were not. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that only the nodal SUVmax was a significantly unfavorable factor for progression-free survival (p = 0.029, hazard ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.38-0.87) and nodal progression-free survival (p = 0.023, hazard ratio 0.51, 95% CI 0.34-0.81). ROC curve analysis and log-rank test showed that patients with a high nodal SUVmax (≧4) had a significantly lower progression-free survival rate than those with a low SUVmax (

Suggested Citation

  • Kazuhiro Kitajima & Yuko Suenaga & Tomonori Kanda & Daisuke Miyawaki & Kenji Yoshida & Yasuo Ejima & Ryohei Sasaki & Hirokazu Komatsu & Miki Saito & Naoki Otsuki & Ken-ichi Nibu & Naomi Kiyota & Tsuto, 2014. "Prognostic Value of FDG PET Imaging in Patients with Laryngeal Cancer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-7, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0096999
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096999
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0096999
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0096999&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0096999?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0096999. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.